--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
[PATCH] gnu: Add gspell |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:26:04 +0100 |
tests are disabled because they fail
I left a pair of attempts I made, commented out
Also, a link to the gspell mailing list where I asked for help
0001-gnu-Add-gspell.patch
Description: Binary data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#25836: [PATCH] gnu: Add gspell |
Date: |
Wed, 17 May 2017 16:24:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
I just pushed gspell as 411ba511893feca223656122059cb12378b95c91,
finally! \o/
Thomas Danckaert <address@hidden> skribis:
> Just for reference, for when we solve the dictionary issue:
>
> While experimenting with this package and (unsuccessfully) trying to get
> it to find aspell dictionaries, I also noticed we could add the
> following native inputs:
>
> + ("docbook-xsl" ,docbook-xsl)
> + ("gobject-introspection" ,gobject-introspection)
> + ("gtk-doc" ,gtk-doc)
> + ("vala" ,vala)
> ("glib" ,glib "bin")
> ("pkg-config" ,pkg-config)
> ("xmllint" ,libxml2)
> ("xorg-server" ,xorg-server)))
>
> and the following configure flag to build docs:
>
> + #:configure-flags '("--enable-gtk-doc")
>
> I'm not really familiar with the gobject system, but I suppose
> generating the bindings is useful? :)
For now we don’t have any users of gspell at all, let alone users of its
Vala bindings, so perhaps we can leave it as is?
Building the docs to a separate “doc” output could be marginally useful,
I think.
WDYT?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
--- End Message ---