emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#23776: closed (Perl's .pod files include timestamp


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#23776: closed (Perl's .pod files include timestamps, making Perl package builds non-deterministic)
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:18:02 +0000

Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2017 16:17:35 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#23776: Perl's .pod files include timestamps, making 
Perl package builds non-deterministic
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #23776,
regarding Perl's .pod files include timestamps, making Perl package builds 
non-deterministic
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
23776: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=23776
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Perl's .pod files include timestamps, making Perl package builds non-deterministic Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:33:46 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
Here’s an example:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ diff -ru /gnu/store/fmib129w05hbwbikd7x48s37hvr8nrdf-perl-io-stringy-2.110 
/gnu/store/fmib129w05hbwbikd7x48s37hvr8nrdf-perl-io-stringy-2.110-check
diff -ru 
/gnu/store/fmib129w05hbwbikd7x48s37hvr8nrdf-perl-io-stringy-2.110/lib/perl5/5.22.1/x86_64-linux/perllocal.pod
 
/gnu/store/fmib129w05hbwbikd7x48s37hvr8nrdf-perl-io-stringy-2.110-check/lib/perl5/5.22.1/x86_64-linux/perllocal.pod
--- 
/gnu/store/fmib129w05hbwbikd7x48s37hvr8nrdf-perl-io-stringy-2.110/lib/perl5/5.22.1/x86_64-linux/perllocal.pod
       1970-01-01 01:00:01.000000000 +0100
+++ 
/gnu/store/fmib129w05hbwbikd7x48s37hvr8nrdf-perl-io-stringy-2.110-check/lib/perl5/5.22.1/x86_64-linux/perllocal.pod
 1970-01-01 01:00:01.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-=head2 Thu Jun 16 11:29:36 2016: C<Module> L<IO::Stringy|IO::Stringy>
+=head2 Thu Jun 16 11:29:34 2016: C<Module> L<IO::Stringy|IO::Stringy>
 
 =over 4
 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

The problem is described in <git://git.debian.org/git/reproducible/notes.git>:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
timestamps_in_documentation_generated_by_podman:
  description: |
    The module Pod::Man includes timestamps in its embedded manpages:
    
http://sources.debian.net/src/perl/latest/cpan/podlators/lib/Pod/Man.pm/?hl=1700#L977
    They should be based on the mtime of the original file.
  url: 
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsInManpagesGeneratedByPodMan
  deterministic: True
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Ludo’.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#23776: Perl's .pod files include timestamps, making Perl package builds non-deterministic Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 16:17:35 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:

> Marius Bakke <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:

[...]

>>> For the record, even though Pod::Man supposedly honors SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
>>> as of Perl 5.24, we still have this problem:
>>>
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>> $ diff -r 
>>> /gnu/store/hczskszmhm2l65vy8nv990lzc5dk3ln9-perl-algorithm-c3-0.10{,-check}
>>> diff -r 
>>> /gnu/store/hczskszmhm2l65vy8nv990lzc5dk3ln9-perl-algorithm-c3-0.10/lib/perl5/5.24.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/perllocal.pod
>>>  
>>> /gnu/store/hczskszmhm2l65vy8nv990lzc5dk3ln9-perl-algorithm-c3-0.10-check/lib/perl5/5.24.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/perllocal.pod
>>> 1c1
>>> < =head2 Wed Jan 11 22:20:36 2017: C<Module> L<Algorithm::C3|Algorithm::C3>
>>> ---
>>>> =head2 Wed Jan 11 22:20:34 2017: C<Module> L<Algorithm::C3|Algorithm::C3>
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>
>> Isn't this fixed by be12f4e27505edd87c4aa457fec43dd0fee23b79 from
>> 'core-updates'?
>
> Oh, probably!  I had forgotten about it, thanks for the heads-up.

Closing this bug!

Ludo’.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]