emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#30641: closed (Make 'guix refresh' to ignore "v" p


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#30641: closed (Make 'guix refresh' to ignore "v" prefix in CPAN updater)
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 13:59:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 01 Mar 2018 14:58:04 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#30641: Make 'guix refresh' to ignore "v" prefix in 
CPAN updater
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #30641,
regarding Make 'guix refresh' to ignore "v" prefix in CPAN updater
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
30641: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30641
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Make 'guix refresh' to ignore "v" prefix in CPAN updater Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 05:12:26 +0300 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
Hello Guix,

Previous discussion [1] talks about ‘guix refresh’ for CPAN updater
needs to ignore ‘v’ prefix in a ‘version’ field of a package record.

Marius Bakke <address@hidden> writes:

> Oleg Pykhalov <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Marius Bakke <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Sorry, I meant the opposite: we don't add the "v" prefix.  It would be
>>> nice to make the CPAN updater aware of that.
>>
>> I'll close current bug report.  Should we open a new one for CPAN
>> updater fix purpose?

Sounds good!  I think the GitHub updater already ignores the "v" prefix
when comparing versions, so there might be some inspiration there.

>>>> I see a bunch of packages packages have "v" prefix:
>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>>> ./gnu/packages/perl.scm:3599:    (version "v2.49.1")
>>>> ./gnu/packages/perl.scm:7969:    (version "v0.0.2")
>>>> ./gnu/packages/perl.scm:8697:  (version "v0.2.13")
>>>> ./gnu/packages/networking.scm:778:  (version "v0.003")
>>>> ./gnu/packages/mail.scm:1755:  (version "v2.9.0")
>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>>
>>> Let's fix these :-)
>>
>> I guess it's better to do after a CPAN updater fix.  WDYT?

No opinion either way :-)


Example of ‘guix refresh’ [2] wants to upgrade a package with the same
version because of ‘v’ prefix:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
/home/natsu/src/guix-wip-licensecheck/gnu/packages/license.scm:108:2: 
licensecheck <at> 3.0.31: can be upgraded to v3.0.31
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---


[1]  https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30274#164
[2]  https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30274#161


Oleg.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#30641: Make 'guix refresh' to ignore "v" prefix in CPAN updater Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 14:58:04 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
Hi,

Oleg Pykhalov <address@hidden> skribis:

> Marius Bakke <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Oleg Pykhalov <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Marius Bakke <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> Sorry, I meant the opposite: we don't add the "v" prefix.  It would be
>>>> nice to make the CPAN updater aware of that.
>>>
>>> I'll close current bug report.  Should we open a new one for CPAN
>>> updater fix purpose?
>
> Sounds good!  I think the GitHub updater already ignores the "v" prefix
> when comparing versions, so there might be some inspiration there.
>
>>>>> I see a bunch of packages packages have "v" prefix:
>>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>>>> ./gnu/packages/perl.scm:3599:    (version "v2.49.1")
>>>>> ./gnu/packages/perl.scm:7969:    (version "v0.0.2")
>>>>> ./gnu/packages/perl.scm:8697:  (version "v0.2.13")
>>>>> ./gnu/packages/networking.scm:778:  (version "v0.003")
>>>>> ./gnu/packages/mail.scm:1755:  (version "v2.9.0")
>>>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>>>
>>>> Let's fix these :-)
>>>
>>> I guess it's better to do after a CPAN updater fix.  WDYT?
>
> No opinion either way :-)

Could you fix these?

> Example of ‘guix refresh’ [2] wants to upgrade a package with the same
> version because of ‘v’ prefix:
>
> /home/natsu/src/guix-wip-licensecheck/gnu/packages/license.scm:108:2: 
> licensecheck <at> 3.0.31: can be upgraded to v3.0.31

That turned out to be easy to fix, done in
b402f4ee34d35f9b934b5449d2cc419dc287895e.

Thanks,
Ludo’.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]