[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#31298: closed ([PATCH 0/2] Add some packages relat

From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#31298: closed ([PATCH 0/2] Add some packages related to security tokens)
Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 05:50:02 +0000

Your message dated Tue, 01 May 2018 22:49:40 -0700
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#31298] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add yubico-piv-tool.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #31298,
regarding [PATCH 0/2] Add some packages related to security tokens
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact

31298: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=31298
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Add some packages related to security tokens Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 03:57:13 -0700
Hi Guix!

These two patches add opensc and yubico-piv-tool.  The former is
useful because, among other reasons, its PKCS#11 shared library can be
used with an SSH agent to fetch credentials from a smart card (such as
a YubiKey).  The latter is useful for interacting with the PIV
application on a YubiKey.  I have verified that both of these work on
my system for those purposes, with a YubiKey.

To successfully use the OpenSC PKCS#11 shared library with an SSH
agent, you need to take care to start your ssh-agent with the -P
option to whitelist the path of the library's .so file.  If you don't
do that, then any attempt to invoke ssh-add with the -s option will
fail with a generic message.

Chris Marusich (2):
  gnu: Add opensc.
  gnu: Add yubico-piv-tool.

 gnu/packages/security-token.scm | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#31298] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add yubico-piv-tool. Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 22:49:40 -0700 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> I think you can omit the bit about the m4/ directory since it’s pretty
> much the same story in many packages.

That's true.  I've tidied up the comment and committed this as

Thank you for the review!


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]