--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
[PATCH] gnu: emacs-orgalist: Fix texinfo markup in description. |
|
Date: |
Tue, 15 May 2018 22:03:15 +0200 |
* gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-orgalist)[description]: Modify.
---
gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
index 71e969006..f3d08e810 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm
@@ -4743,7 +4743,7 @@ specifically, Orgalist supports the syntax of Org mode
for numbered,
unnumbered, description items, checkboxes, and counter cookies.
The library also implements radio lists, i.e., lists written in Org
-syntax later translated into the host format, e.g., @LaTeX{} or HTML.")
+syntax later translated into the host format, e.g., LaTeX or HTML.")
(license license:gpl3+)))
(define-public emacs-writegood-mode
--
2.17.0
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
Re: [bug#31464] [PATCH] gnu: emacs-orgalist: Fix texinfo markup in description. |
|
Date: |
Wed, 16 May 2018 11:08:55 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hello!
Gábor Boskovits <address@hidden> skribis:
> 2018-05-16 5:16 GMT+02:00 Eric Bavier <address@hidden>:
>
>> On Tue, 15 May 2018 22:55:11 +0200
>> Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> > Gábor Boskovits <address@hidden> writes:
>> >
>> > > This markup breaks guix package -s on current master.
>> > > And guix lint also says, that there is invalid markup in the
>> description.
>> > > You might mean @dfn{LaTeX}, though.
>> >
>> > Yet, @LaTeX{} is valid Texinfo code.
>>
>> Yes, but guile's (texinfo) module does not understand the entire set of
>> texinfo commands. I'm not sure whether the subset it does understand
>> is even clearly documented.
>>
>>
> I guess that we can contribute the @LaTeX{} macro to the guile module,
> at least a simplified version for sure, but I don't think it will make
> before
> core-updates next. In my opinion this fix is an acceptable tradeoff.
> We might add a comment to modify the markup, once support lands
> in guile, if it is deemed necessary. WDYT?
Clearly Guile’s (texinfo) modules could be improved. In the meantime,
I’ve pushed this patch to fix the immediate issue.
Note that even when (texinfo) understands @LaTeX{}, we’ll probably
refrain from using it because Guix could be running on an older Guile.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
--- End Message ---