|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | [debbugs-tracker] bug#31536: closed (Misused Texinfo markup in misc.texi and ack.texi(emacs-26).) |
Date: | Sun, 20 May 2018 07:18:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2018 10:17:09 +0300 with message-id <address@hidden> and subject line Re: bug#31536: Misused Texinfo markup in misc.texi and ack.texi(emacs-26). has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #31536, regarding Misused Texinfo markup in misc.texi and ack.texi(emacs-26). to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact address@hidden) -- 31536: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=31536 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Misused Texinfo markup in misc.texi and ack.texi(emacs-26). Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 10:45:06 +0900 Hi Emacs developers.In misc.texi (and ack.texi), there are misused Texinfo markups.>>> start hereack.texi:1099:William Schelter wrote @file{telnet.el}, support for @code{telnet}misc.texi:1513:would from a regular terminal (e.g., using the @code{ssh} ormisc.texi:1514:@code{telnet} or @code{rlogin} commands), from a Term window.<<<end here
I think these @code{...} markups should marked with @command{...}.Thanks.ayatakesi <address@hidden>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#31536: Misused Texinfo markup in misc.texi and ack.texi(emacs-26). Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 10:17:09 +0300 > From: Takesi Ayanokoji <address@hidden> > Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 10:45:06 +0900 > > In misc.texi (and ack.texi), there are misused Texinfo markups. > > >>> start here > ack.texi:1099:William Schelter wrote @file{telnet.el}, support for > @code{telnet} > misc.texi:1513:would from a regular terminal (e.g., using the @code{ssh} or > misc.texi:1514:@code{telnet} or @code{rlogin} commands), from a Term window. > <<<end here > > I think these @code{...} markups should marked with @command{...}. The effect of @command is the same as that of @code, see the Texinfo manual. We didn't use @command for a long time because we tried to be compatible to old versions of Texinfo, which didn't support it. Now that reason is gone, so I fixed the misc.texi parts. I left alone the ack.texi part, since I didn't feel like changing attributions just on behalf of an unimportant markup issue. Thanks.
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |