|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | [debbugs-tracker] bug#32890: closed ([PATCH 0/2] test mems) |
Date: | Thu, 04 Oct 2018 02:32:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Thu, 04 Oct 2018 04:30:57 +0200 with message-id <address@hidden> and subject line Re: [PATCH 0/2] test mems has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #32890, regarding [PATCH 0/2] test mems to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact address@hidden) -- 32890: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32890 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: [PATCH 0/2] test mems Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2018 12:14:21 +0200 Guix, Here are some memory testers.Memtest86+ must be built with '--system=i686-linux' (is there a way to ask for a 32-bit glibc on x86_64?) and still needs to be tested by a volunteer with a BIOS machine. It can be launched from GRUB ('linux16 memtest') or catted to a boot disc (memtest.bin).Memtester runs in user space and can even run as a regular user. It should just work.Kind regards, T G-R
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] test mems Pushed as 5eff43804eaed5744967f83edbaeb7ffdb77aec1 & fb5412511479c19b3e4c884e9cc65e652ea923e2 with the aforementioned changes, as well as descriptions which (I hope) better describe both tools' similarities and differences. Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 04:30:57 +0200 Kind regards, T G-R
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |