[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#33284: closed ([PATCH] python: Honor '--cores=...'

From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#33284: closed ([PATCH] python: Honor '--cores=...' in tests.)
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 06:46:02 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 17 Nov 2018 00:45:15 -0600
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#33284] [PATCH] python: Honor '--cores=...' in tests.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #33284,
regarding [PATCH] python: Honor '--cores=...' in tests.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact

33284: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=33284
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] python: Honor '--cores=...' in tests. Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 20:23:44 -0600
Hello Guix,

I noticed building 'python-minimal' that its tests seemed to have poor
memory performance, i.e. using *a lot* of RAM.  I thought maybe
dropping --cores=... would help, but it did not; the tests use all
available cores by default.  The attached patch fixes this issue,
though, the package still uses all cores while building some extension

I suppose this patch would go to core-updates?


Attachment: 0001-python-Honor-cores-.-in-tests.patch
Description: Text Data

Attachment: pgps2GtgKCD29.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#33284] [PATCH] python: Honor '--cores=...' in tests. Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 00:45:15 -0600
On Tue, 06 Nov 2018 17:00:01 +0100
Marius Bakke <address@hidden> wrote:

> Eric Bavier <address@hidden> writes:
> > Hello Mathieu,
> >
> > On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 14:07:47 +0900
> > Mathieu Othacehe <address@hidden> wrote:
> >  
> >> Hi Eric,
> >> 
> >> Your patch seems go to me, even if I think the root cause of your problem
> >> is fixed by:
> >> 
> >> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=33186#26
> >> 
> >> I think that both could be applied to core-updates.  
> >
> > Thanks for the link; it looks like it should help.  But, yes, I think
> > both can be applied.  
> Note that the broken test has already been removed on 'core-updates'.
> Eric: can you push a 'python-updates' branch?  I wonder if we have time
> for a "half-rebuild" before the next 'core-updates' round; I've got some
> other heavy-impact patches in my pipeline (Glib, Cairo, ++).
> The patch LGTM.

I've pushed this to the core-updates-next branch in commit


Attachment: pgpQWyNMDL4vr.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]