--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
26.1.92; Minor typos across manuals |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Mar 2019 08:41:21 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
0001-Fix-some-plural-Message-IDs-typos-in-Gnus-docs.patch
Description: Text Data
0002-Fix-possessive-it-s-its-typos-in-manuals.patch
Description: Text Data
0003-Fix-an-other-another-typos-in-manuals.patch
Description: Text Data
Are the three attached patches acceptable for the emacs-26 branch?
If so, should I add this bug number to all or none of them?
Thanks,
--
Basil
In GNU Emacs 26.1.92 (build 5, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll
bars)
of 2019-03-05 built on thunk
Repository revision: 52fd40068e0f8b41bd29eaec1334299eb86d0bff
Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12003000
System Description: Debian GNU/Linux buster/sid
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#34756: 26.1.92; Minor typos across manuals |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:44:12 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
fixed 34756 26.2
quit
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <address@hidden>
>> Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 08:41:21 +0000
>>
>> Are the three attached patches acceptable for the emacs-26 branch?
>
> Documentation changes should always go to the release branch, unless
> they document features only available on master.
>
>> If so, should I add this bug number to all or none of them?
>
> It's okay to push all of them under the same bug number, and even in a
> single commit. There's no need to distinguish between changes that
> correct typos, they are all "alike" for all practical purposes.
Thanks for clarifying, I've now pushed to the release branch. Let me
know if anything is amiss, e.g. if signed commits are frowned upon.
--
Basil
--- End Message ---