emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#33888: closed ([PATCH] gnu: Add sway.)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#33888: closed ([PATCH] gnu: Add sway.)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:38:01 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 11 Mar 2019 20:37:34 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add sway.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #33888,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: Add sway.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
33888: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=33888
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add sway. Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:05:03 +0100
Hey Guix,

these patches add Sway.

Note that with
(screen-locker-service sway "swaylock")
we should now have a native Wayland screen locker.

Supposedly this can be done without making the swaylock binary SUID,
but I've been unable to figure out how.

Attachment: 0001-Add-wlroots.patch
Description: Text Data

Attachment: 0002-gnu-Add-sway.patch
Description: Text Data

Attachment: pgpRkYDdbN8E6.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add sway. Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 20:37:34 +0100
Sway 1.0 just got released. Since this bug has been open for a very
long time and all the pieces are in place, I've gone ahead with
rebasing and merging.

On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 14:01:07 +0100
Rutger Helling <address@hidden> wrote:

> I've been told that the Sway developers don't want this release
> packaged. And it unfortunately also depends on staging, which I
> missed.
> 
> Having said that, if there are no objections I'd like to merge this
> once it hits 1.0 and staging is merged.
> 
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:05:03 +0100
> Rutger Helling <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > Hey Guix,
> > 
> > these patches add Sway.
> > 
> > Note that with
> > (screen-locker-service sway "swaylock")
> > we should now have a native Wayland screen locker.
> > 
> > Supposedly this can be done without making the swaylock binary SUID,
> > but I've been unable to figure out how.  
> 

Attachment: pgppl4g2uaWBr.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]