emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#35623: closed (guix pull failed on RHEL7)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#35623: closed (guix pull failed on RHEL7)
Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 22:20:02 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 13 May 2019 00:19:23 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: FW: bug#35623: guix pull failed on RHEL7
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #35623,
regarding guix pull failed on RHEL7
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
35623: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35623
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: guix pull failed on RHEL7 Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 18:03:46 +0000
Note, I ran this with non privileged permissions, which might be wrong.  I am 
only sending this email because the program requested it.


address@hidden ~]$ uname -a
Linux kmcdermo-ld2.linkedin.biz 3.10.0-514.55.4.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Aug 10 
17:03:02 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

address@hidden ~]$ guix pull
Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 
'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'...
Building from this channel:
  guix      https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git   338defe
Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'...  Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
   222:29 19 (map1 (((guix i18n)) ((guix colors)) ((guix gexp)) (#) ?))
   222:29 18 (map1 (((guix colors)) ((guix gexp)) ((guix sets)) (#) ?))
   222:29 17 (map1 (((guix gexp)) ((guix sets)) ((guix utils)) (#) ?))
   222:29 16 (map1 (((guix sets)) ((guix utils)) ((guix store)) (#) ?))
   222:29 15 (map1 (((guix utils)) ((guix store)) ((guix config)) # ?))
   222:29 14 (map1 (((guix store)) ((guix config)) ((guix #)) ((?)) ?))
   222:29 13 (map1 (((guix config)) ((guix packages)) ((guix #)) # ?))
   222:29 12 (map1 (((guix packages)) ((guix profiles)) ((guix #)) ?))
   222:17 11 (map1 (((guix profiles)) ((guix derivations)) ((# #)) ?))
  2800:17 10 (resolve-interface (guix profiles) #:select _ #:hide _ # ?)
In ice-9/threads.scm:
    390:8  9 (_ _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  2726:13  8 (_)
In ice-9/threads.scm:
    390:8  7 (_ _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  2994:20  6 (_)
   2312:4  5 (save-module-excursion #<procedure 2adf2d0 at ice-9/boo?>)
  3014:26  4 (_)
In unknown file:
           3 (primitive-load-path "guix/profiles" #<procedure 292eae?>)
In ./guix/profiles.scm:
  1788:23  2 (_)
In ./guix/utils.scm:
   661:47  1 (xdg-directory _ "/.config" #:ensure? _)
In unknown file:
           0 (getpw 10452)

ERROR: In procedure getpw:
In procedure getpw: entry not found
-guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program 
'/gnu/store/4hsmk7kh62yvbi154pyy3nq8drml116a-compute-guix-derivation'
failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: 
"338defe0cbe156e8416647035403fccf059555e0"; system: "x86_64-linux";
host version: "1.0.0"; pull-version: 1).
Please report it by email to <address@hidden>.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: FW: bug#35623: guix pull failed on RHEL7 Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 00:19:23 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)
Hi,

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <address@hidden> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Commit 48d498c2c3984784336b27ba5e261319f3ac6a3a lets HOME pass
>> through, which should sidestep the problem you encountered.
>
> This breaks ‘guix pull’, but I can't for the life of me see how HOME
> is being applied here.

Ouch, sorry for the mess, and thanks for reverting quickly!

I reverted the revert and added a fix in commit
e0244eb7a2290781ef490b6cedbd9c753caf6004.

Thanks,
Ludo’.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]