[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#35869: closed ([PATCH] `cl-member' and `cl-assoc'

From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#35869: closed ([PATCH] `cl-member' and `cl-assoc' do not work for bignums)
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2019 01:16:02 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 1 Jun 2019 18:15:45 -0700
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [PATCH] `cl-member' and `cl-assoc' do not work for bignums
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #35869,
regarding [PATCH] `cl-member' and `cl-assoc' do not work for bignums
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact

35869: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35869
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] `cl-member' and `cl-assoc' do not work for bignums Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 18:01:05 +0200
(cl-member (ash 1 100) (list (ash 1 100))) => nil
(cl-assoc (ash 1 100) (list (cons (ash 1 100) t))) => nil

Suggested patch attached.

Attachment: 0001-Fix-cl-member-and-cl-assoc-for-bignums.patch
Description: Binary data

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [PATCH] `cl-member' and `cl-assoc' do not work for bignums Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2019 18:15:45 -0700 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 Thanks, I installed that into the master branch, along with the attached minor tuneup to restore some of the optimization that was in the original code.

Attachment: 0001-Tune-cl-assoc.patch
Description: Text Data

--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]