[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#35930: closed (haskell Setup.hs-related changes)

From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#35930: closed (haskell Setup.hs-related changes)
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 03:06:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 13 Jun 2019 23:05:35 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#35930] haskell Setup.hs-related changes
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #35930,
regarding haskell Setup.hs-related changes
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact

35930: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35930
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: haskell Setup.hs-related changes Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 21:52:47 +0200
This primarily moves the substitution of missing Setup.hs files to
haskell-build-system. There was already duplicate code in a number
of packages to generated boilerplate Setup.hs, and I ran into a
couple more while trying to import some other packages.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#35930] haskell Setup.hs-related changes Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 23:05:35 -0400 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)

Robert Vollmert <address@hidden> writes:

>> On 13. Jun 2019, at 17:57, Timothy Sample <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>  https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/35930
>> The first patch breaks “ghc-easyplot”.
>> I’m currently building some packages to test the other patches, and if
>> everything builds fine, they LGTM with some minor tweaks (which I’ve
>> already made).  Should I push it to master or staging?  It means
>> rebuilding all of our Haskell packages, which is a few hundered
>> packages.
>> Robert, do you know why the first patch doesn’t work?  Should I just
>> omit it?
> Yes go head, I thought it worked at some point but am very doubtful
> right now. I’ll look into it again, but it’s not a necessary part here
> I think.

Pushed to staging, since ~550 packages is well over the manual’s
recommended limit of 300.

I omitted the first patch and merged the last two together (doing so is
consistent with similar changes in the past).

Thanks Robert!

-- Tim

--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]