emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#34789: closed (mantemp.el should be obsoleted)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#34789: closed (mantemp.el should be obsoleted)
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 09:10:02 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 22 Jun 2019 12:09:30 +0300
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#34789: Scan of regexp mistakes
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #34789,
regarding mantemp.el should be obsoleted
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
34789: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34789
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: mantemp.el should be obsoleted Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 11:16:27 -0800 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1
Davis Herring writes, "One of your fixes was to progmodes/mantemp.el,
which (now that I know it exists) I'm pretty sure should be obsoleted;
as you may already know, C++ compilers haven't worked that way for any
standard library type (and most user-defined types) in a very long time."

I notice that no significant changes have been made to mantemp.el since
1997. As it's evidently useless nowadays, I propose that we move
mantemp.el to the obsolete area, and remove it in a later Emacs release.





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#34789: Scan of regexp mistakes Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 12:09:30 +0300
> From: Stefan Kangas <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:42:40 +0200
> Cc: address@hidden, Davis Herring <address@hidden>
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> > > > Thanks, it does.  I think we indeed should move this package into
> > > > obsolete/.
> > >
> > > Does this patch do the job?
> >
> > Works for me, but I'm not sure we have the procedure for obsoleting a
> > package documented anywhere, so maybe something else needs to be
> > done.  Anyone?
> 
> I had a look at this:
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=emacs.git;a=commit;h=ef65424de8cae00209f6a0974245822602709df3
> 
> And did some improvements, see attached patch.

Thanks, pushed.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]