[debbugs-tracker] bug#36213: closed ([PATCH 0/4] Add pulseaudio-dlna)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 04 Jul 2019 18:07:05 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#36213] [PATCH 4/4] gnu: Add pulseaudio-dlna.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #36213,
regarding [PATCH 0/4] Add pulseaudio-dlna
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
36213: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36213
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH 0/4] Add pulseaudio-dlna
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 14 Jun 2019 19:21:17 +0000
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.6-663-gf46ad30-fmstable-20190607v1
>
>
>
>
> This patch series adds pulseaudio-dlna, which lets you stream audio to 
> Chromecast and DLNA devices (like Sonos speakers).
>
> -- 
> Alex Griffin
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: [bug#36213] [PATCH 4/4] gnu: Add pulseaudio-dlna.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 04 Jul 2019 18:07:05 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> "Alex Griffin" <address@hidden> skribis:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019, at 3:54 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> > +(define-public pulseaudio-dlna
> >> > +  (let ((commit "4472928dd23f274193f14289f59daec411023ab0")
> >> > +        (revision "1"))
> >> 
> >> Could you explain why you chose this commit rather than the latest
> >> release?
> >
> > Honestly, I just noticed that Debian was building from git. I assumed they 
> > had a good reason, so I didn't even try the latest release from 2016.
>
> OK.  There have been quite a few commits since that 2016 release, so it
> probably makes sense to use the latest one.
>
> >> > +      (arguments `(#:python ,python-2))
> >> 
> >> Can it run on Python 3?
> >> 
> >> Since Python 2 is approaching EOL, we’re trying to avoid adding more
> >> Python 2 packages.  If we could remove ‘python2-’ packages from this
> >> patch series, that’d be great; if not, so be it!
> >
> > No, it doesn't run on Python 3. It's actually unmaintained right now, but I'm 
> > not aware of any other free software projects that provide the same 
> > functionality.
>
> OK.
>
> I took the liberty to add some of what you wrote as comments in the
> code and pushed the whole series.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ludo’.
>
>
> --- End Message ---