[debbugs-tracker] bug#37350: closed ([PATCH] Update emacs-interactive-align.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 12 Sep 2019 23:25:09 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#37350] [PATCH] Update emacs-interactive-align.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #37350,
regarding [PATCH] Update emacs-interactive-align.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
37350: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=37350
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] Update emacs-interactive-align. Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 06:48:09 +0200

See attached.

0001-gnu-emacs-interactive-align-Update-to-0.4.2-1.e1308c.patch
Description: Text Data

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: [bug#37350] [PATCH] Update emacs-interactive-align.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 12 Sep 2019 23:25:09 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Brian Leung <address@hidden> skribis:
>
> > I've attached an alternate update, which updates from the current Guix's
> > 0.1.0 to 0.4.2 instead of from 0.1.0 to 0.4.2-some-commit.
>
> Applied!
>
> > I feel like the update to the nonversioned tree is slightly preferable
> > since of the seven commits where the nonversioned tree is ahead, five are
> > bugfixes and/or small refactors, one is a Readme change, and only one is a
> > feature addition. But I don't feel too strongly either way.
>
> Yeah, but then I’d argue that upstream should cut a new release.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>
>
> --- End Message ---