emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#38862: closed (attribution line parsing)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#38862: closed (attribution line parsing)
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2020 06:02:02 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 3 Jan 2020 22:01:38 -0800
with message-id <CA+8g5KF=8BWsToL=LZQovG0vTSkzYFjCf9i0K=address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [Bug-vc-dwim] bug#38862: attribution line parsing
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #38862,
regarding attribution line parsing
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
38862: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=38862
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: attribution line parsing Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 19:43:14 -0700
Hi Jim - When I had only a single space between date and name in the
attribution line, as in:

2020-01-01 Karl Berry  <address@hidden>

vcd gave no errors by default. Then I accidentally ran vcd --commit with
that CL and the only error (warning) was at the end, direct from Perl:

Use of uninitialized value $author in sprintf at /u/karl/gnu/src/vkarl/VC.pm 
line 210.
Use of uninitialized value $author in sprintf at /u/karl/gnu/src/vkarl/VC.pm 
line 210.

I was not left in a good state.  There seemed to be no good way to
recover from this, since the erroneous ChangeLog was already committed,
so vcd did not think there were any files in the ChangeLog lines.

So I ended up doing rm -rf .git/c/.git and running vcd --init again to
restart my CL repo, and also
  git fetch && git reset --hard origin && git checkout && git submodule update
to eradicate all my changes (after saving the actual diff :) in the
source repo. Thankfully, that apparently erased the memory of the bad CL
so I could proceed.

Instead of worrying about the exact number of spaces, I wonder about
parsing attr lines by checking that first word is a YYYY-MM-DD date, the
last word is <address@hidden>, and considering the words in between to be
the real name.

Reasonable error msgs would then be easy to give if the first and last
words don't fit the expected syntax.  And if there is no author, it
could give up at that point. After all, vcd relies on all kinds of
finicky details about the CL, so seems like it might as well force a
good attr line too instead of accepting bad ones.

If the idea seems ok, maybe one of us (or a new contributor!) can work
in that direction eventually. --best, karl.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [Bug-vc-dwim] bug#38862: attribution line parsing Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 22:01:38 -0800
On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 6:44 PM Karl Berry <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Jim - When I had only a single space between date and name in the
> attribution line, as in:
>
> 2020-01-01 Karl Berry  <address@hidden>
>
> vcd gave no errors by default. Then I accidentally ran vcd --commit with
> that CL and the only error (warning) was at the end, direct from Perl:
>
> Use of uninitialized value $author in sprintf at /u/karl/gnu/src/vkarl/VC.pm 
> line 210.
> Use of uninitialized value $author in sprintf at /u/karl/gnu/src/vkarl/VC.pm 
> line 210.
>
> I was not left in a good state.  There seemed to be no good way to
> recover from this, since the erroneous ChangeLog was already committed,
> so vcd did not think there were any files in the ChangeLog lines.
>
> So I ended up doing rm -rf .git/c/.git and running vcd --init again to
> restart my CL repo, and also
>   git fetch && git reset --hard origin && git checkout && git submodule update
> to eradicate all my changes (after saving the actual diff :) in the
> source repo. Thankfully, that apparently erased the memory of the bad CL
> so I could proceed.
>
> Instead of worrying about the exact number of spaces, I wonder about
> parsing attr lines by checking that first word is a YYYY-MM-DD date, the
> last word is <address@hidden>, and considering the words in between to be
> the real name.
>
> Reasonable error msgs would then be easy to give if the first and last
> words don't fit the expected syntax.  And if there is no author, it
> could give up at that point. After all, vcd relies on all kinds of
> finicky details about the CL, so seems like it might as well force a
> good attr line too instead of accepting bad ones.
>
> If the idea seems ok, maybe one of us (or a new contributor!) can work
> in that direction eventually. --best, karl.

Hi Karl,
Thanks for reporting and digging into that.
Here's the change that I've just pushed to address it:

Attachment: vcd-diagnose-bad-date-line.diff
Description: Binary data


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]