emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#39414: closed ([PATCH core-updates 0/2] Clarify search path handling


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#39414: closed ([PATCH core-updates 0/2] Clarify search path handling in commencement.scm)
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 17:49:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 06 Feb 2020 18:48:11 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#39414] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: commencement: Rationalize 
search path handling.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #39414,
regarding [PATCH core-updates 0/2] Clarify search path handling in 
commencement.scm
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
39414: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=39414
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH core-updates 0/2] Clarify search path handling in commencement.scm Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 13:53:14 +0100
Hello Guix!

The patch below for current ‘core-updates’ is an attempt to clarify
search path handling in commencement.scm by:

  1. Having ‘native-search-paths’ fields only for compilers—e.g.,
     “C_INCLUDE_PATH” belongs to the compiler, not to libc.

  2. Avoiding phases that manually fiddle with search path
     environment variables: normally, this is handled automatically
     by the ‘set-paths’ phase based on the declared search paths,
     so manual fiddling should be a last resort and it should be
     well commented so we remember why it’s there.

This is an attempt to reduce complexity and keep things declarative
as much as possible.  I’ve tested it on top of
46312064de8ae0cca531fddbc4b5ec8421e5d866 and “guix build coreutils”
succeeds.

There’s another pattern that I found hard to follow that has to do
with the reuse of build phases.

For example, there’s a build phase named ‘setenv’ (perhaps we should
find a more descriptive name :-)) in the various GCCs that is reused
or replaced; when looking at a specific package, it’s difficult to
see which phases it really runs because this particular phase is
inherited and modified on several layers.  If I can make time for it,
I’ll see if I can come up with a proposal to clarify this, but at any
rate, it’s probably something to keep in mind for future changes.

Thoughts?  (I’m particularly interested in your feedback, janneke!)

Ludo’.

Ludovic Courtès (2):
  gnu: commencement: Avoid hard-coded GCC version numbers.
  gnu: commencement: Rationalize search path handling.

 gnu/packages/commencement.scm | 201 ++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 153 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.0




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#39414] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: commencement: Rationalize search path handling. Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 18:48:11 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
Pushed as 558b0bbe291b2f2cd38b7f4eadc827e2ed102c54!

Ludo'.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]