[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#40032: closed ([PATCH] gnu: Add nvme-cli)

From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#40032: closed ([PATCH] gnu: Add nvme-cli)
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 17:58:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 15 Mar 2020 13:57:22 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#40032] [PATCH] gnu: Add nvme-cli
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #40032,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: Add nvme-cli
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact

40032: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40032
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add nvme-cli Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 02:13:06 +0100
Lightly tested (list & list-subsys commands)
on real hardware.

Guix pack'ed the binary and copied out of the
VM to run (in debian)

Vincent Legoll

Attachment: 0001-gnu-Add-nvme-cli.patch
Description: Text Data

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#40032] [PATCH] gnu: Add nvme-cli Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 13:57:22 -0400
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 06:36:54PM +0100, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> From 4f794f64ca5438773fc9980bbf0cf5739144dc87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vincent Legoll <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 01:51:12 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add nvme-cli
> * gnu/packages/linux.scm (nvme-cli): New variable.

Thanks! Pushed as 323841bda4e5b8f9b30626ab768aaf711ee6aabf with the
following changes that I somehow forgot to mention. There was no need to
make you revise the patch again...

> +       #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
> +                  (delete 'configure)

I added a comment about why the phase is deleted.

> +                  (replace 'install
> +                    (lambda _
> +                      (zero? (system* "make" "install-spec" "PREFIX="
> +                                      (string-append "DESTDIR=" %output))))))

I replaced (zero? (system* ...)) with (invoke ...), which raises
exceptions on failure rather than returning a boolean #f. This is "the
Guix way" for a while now:


> +    (description "Utility to provide standards compliant tooling for 
> NVM-Express
> +drives.  It was made specifically for Linux as it relies on the IOCTLs 
> defined

And I made this first sentence into a complete sentence.

--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]