emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#40151: closed (28.0.50; Remove Date header from message-draft-header


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#40151: closed (28.0.50; Remove Date header from message-draft-headers)
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:42:03 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 20 Mar 2020 11:41:11 -0700
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#40151: 28.0.50; Remove Date header from 
message-draft-headers
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #40151,
regarding 28.0.50; Remove Date header from message-draft-headers
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
40151: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40151
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 28.0.50; Remove Date header from message-draft-headers Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:11:14 -0700
It was noted on gnus.general that it's weird to have the Date header as
part of the default value of `message-draft-headers'. Having it in there
means that a Date header is generated (and fixed) when a message is
first saved or delayed, not when it is sent. In the case of delayed
messages, in particular, it's weird that the eventually-sent message can
have a Date header days or weeks in the past.

Is there any interest in changing the default value?

Eric

Attachment: message-draft-headers.diff
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#40151: 28.0.50; Remove Date header from message-draft-headers Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 11:41:11 -0700 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:

> Eric Abrahamsen <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> How's this look?
>
> [...]
>
>> +The value of `message-draft-headers' determines which headers are
>> +generate when the article is delayed.  Remaining headers are
>            ^d
>
>> +generate when the article is sent."
>            ^d

A weird typo to make twice...

> Otherwise -- looks good to me.

Done, thanks.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]