emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#40163: closed ([PATCH] gnu: blktrace: Update to db4f634.)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#40163: closed ([PATCH] gnu: blktrace: Update to db4f634.)
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 14:23:02 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 21 Mar 2020 15:22:09 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#40163] [PATCH] gnu: blktrace: Update to db4f634.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #40163,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: blktrace: Update to db4f634.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
40163: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40163
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] gnu: blktrace: Update to db4f634. Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 13:08:25 +0100
Wow, that was fast !

The cleanup series got applied instantly, in
retrospect, I should have done it before
submitting blktrace for inclusion in guix, it
would have caused less churn...

I incremented revision, is that the right
thing to do ?

-- 
Vincent Legoll

Attachment: 0001-gnu-blktrace-Update-to-db4f634.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#40163] [PATCH] gnu: blktrace: Update to db4f634. Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 15:22:09 +0100 User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3
Hello,

> I incremented revision, is that the right
> thing to do ?

Yes, seems fine! Pushed as 93a267b7a40a762a66fa5149336f2c5545cbed30.

Thanks,

Mathieu


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]