emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#33712: closed (Some Mercurial checkouts probably have incorrect hash


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#33712: closed (Some Mercurial checkouts probably have incorrect hashes [was Re: hg-fetch with subrepos])
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 21:00:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 22 Mar 2020 16:59:04 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: Some Mercurial checkouts probably have incorrect hashes
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #33712,
regarding Some Mercurial checkouts probably have incorrect hashes [was Re: 
hg-fetch with subrepos]
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
33712: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=33712
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Some Mercurial checkouts probably have incorrect hashes [was Re: hg-fetch with subrepos] Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 21:08:19 -0500 User-agent: Mutt/1.11.0 (2018-11-25)
On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 02:58:52PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Björn Höfling <address@hidden> skribis:
> > And I stumbled upon that problem too. Ludovic explained me on IRC: The
> > problem is the metadata directory ".hg": It contains metadata that is
> > not fixed. For normal hg-repositories, it will be stripped away, but
> > not recursively for those with sub-repos.

[...]

> However, we should audit current uses of ‘hg-fetch’ with recursive
> sub-repos because there hashes are most likely wrong already.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: Some Mercurial checkouts probably have incorrect hashes Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 16:59:04 -0400
It's been a while and I think that we will have noticed any incorrect
hashes by now. Closing.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]