--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
[PATCH] ui: Mention that changes to package definitions can cause "upgrades". |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:15:32 -0400 |
* guix/ui.scm (show-manifest-transaction)[upgrade-string]: Use the
package name in UI message.
---
guix/ui.scm | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/guix/ui.scm b/guix/ui.scm
index 1e24fe5dca..20b1e79ca9 100644
--- a/guix/ui.scm
+++ b/guix/ui.scm
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
;;; Copyright © 2019 Chris Marusich <address@hidden>
;;; Copyright © 2019 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <address@hidden>
;;; Copyright © 2019 Simon Tournier <address@hidden>
+;;; Copyright © 2020 Leo Famulari <address@hidden>
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
@@ -1162,11 +1163,13 @@ separator between subsequent columns."
name
(string-append name ":" output)))
names outputs)
- (map (lambda (old new)
+ (map (lambda (old new name)
(if (string=? old new)
- (G_ "(dependencies changed)")
+ (format
+ (G_ "(dependencies or ~a package recipe
changed)")
+ name)
(string-append old " " → " " new)))
- old-version new-version))
+ old-version new-version names))
#:initial-indent 3))
(let-values (((remove install upgrade downgrade)
--
2.26.0
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: [bug#40350] [PATCH] ui: Mention that changes to package definitions can cause "upgrades". |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Apr 2020 10:05:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Leo Famulari <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 11:03:22PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Is that not implied in a way?
>
> It is, but I think we will still get some confused users asking about
> it.
>
>> If it is, how about something shorter like:
>>
>> (dependencies or package changed)
>
> Yeah, I think that's okay.
OK, done!
Thanks,
Ludo’.
--- End Message ---