emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#6652: closed ([Feature Request] [emacs] location of file for help fo


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#6652: closed ([Feature Request] [emacs] location of file for help for variables and functions should list full path)
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 12:02:02 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 03 Apr 2020 15:01:08 +0300
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#6679: locate-library does not provide a default when 
called interactively
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #6652,
regarding [Feature Request] [emacs] location of file for help for variables and 
functions should list full path
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
6652: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=6652
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [Feature Request] [emacs] location of file for help for variables and functions should list full path Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:06:46 -0400
When debugging load-path issues, one often wonders where a function or variable was defined. Since the help-for-help for a variable only lists the file of a function, you have to click on the file link, then find the default-directory for that file to see what file it really was loaded from.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#6679: locate-library does not provide a default when called interactively Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 15:01:08 +0300
> From: Štěpán Němec
>  <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 22:59:44 +0100
> Cc: address@hidden
> 
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:14:09 -0600
> Kevin Rodgers wrote:
> 
> > Assuming that complexity is justified, it ought to be factored into a
> > read-library-name utility that both find-library and locate-library use.
> 
> The first part has since happened (`read-library-name'), all that is
> needed is the latter. Patch attached.
> 
> > `C-h a -library\'' returns apropos-library and load-library in addition to
> > find-library and locate-library, but it's not clear to me that they would
> > benefit from a default.
> 
> The patch also handles `load-library'. The set of arguments/completions
> expected/provided by `apropos-library' is slightly different and
> requires other validation, so `read-library-name' wouldn't really help
> there.

Thanks, pushed to the master branch.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]