emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#40528: closed ('guix lint' does not check whether propagated-inputs


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#40528: closed ('guix lint' does not check whether propagated-inputs should be native)
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 21:51:01 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2020 00:50:10 +0300
with message-id <20200409215010.GY1518@E5400>
and subject line Re: bug#40528: 'guix lint' does not check whether 
propagated-inputs should be native
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #40528,
regarding 'guix lint' does not check whether propagated-inputs should be native
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
40528: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40528
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 'guix lint' does not check whether propagated-inputs should be native Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 23:24:25 +0200 User-agent: Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
'guix lint -c inputs-should-be-native' only checks the 'inputs' field of
a package, not propagated-inputs.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#40528: 'guix lint' does not check whether propagated-inputs should be native Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 00:50:10 +0300
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:42:18PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:24:25PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
> >> 'guix lint -c inputs-should-be-native' only checks the 'inputs' field of
> >> a package, not propagated-inputs.
> >
> > The attached patch should add the propagated inputs to the list of
> > inputs to check. Do we want to start telling it to ignore some of them?
> 
> Wow, that was incredibly fast!
> 
> > gnu/packages/check.scm:2200:2: python-nose-timer@0.7.5: 'python-nose' 
> > should probably be a native input
> 
> I'm inclined to leave it.  I think many of these plugin packages should
> not be propagating the package that they plug into anyway.
> 
> LGTM!

OK, patch pushed.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <address@hidden>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]