emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#41809: closed (c-context-line-break incorrect after comments: cache


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#41809: closed (c-context-line-break incorrect after comments: cache issue?)
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:13:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:12:29 +0000
with message-id <20200625171229.GB10342@ACM>
and subject line Re: bug#41809: c-context-line-break incorrect after comments: 
cache issue?
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #41809,
regarding c-context-line-break incorrect after comments: cache issue?
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
41809: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=41809
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: c-context-line-break incorrect after comments: cache issue? Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:09:17 -0700 User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.23 [SVN]
c-context-line-break sometimes incorrectly extends a comment when invoked
immediately after the end of a comment. To repro:

emacs -Q --eval '(progn (c-mode) (insert "/*foo*/") (backward-char)
(c-context-line-break) (delete-char -2) (end-of-line)
(c-context-line-break))'

The second c-context-line-break occurs when point is *after* the comment,
so the /*foo*/ comment shouldn't be extended --- yet it is. The problem
appears to be some kind of cc-mode cache corruption. This recipe behaves
correctly:

$ emacs -Q --eval '(progn (c-mode) (insert "/*foo*/") (backward-char)
(c-context-line-break) (delete-char -2) (end-of-line) (c-before-change
(point-min) (point-max)) (c-after-change (point-min) (point-max) (1-
(point-max))) (c-context-line-break))'




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#41809: c-context-line-break incorrect after comments: cache issue? Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:12:29 +0000
Hello, Daniel.

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 18:38:29 -0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> In article <mailman.1663.1591891807.2541.bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> you wrote:
> > c-context-line-break sometimes incorrectly extends a comment when invoked
> > immediately after the end of a comment. To repro:

> > emacs -Q --eval '(progn (c-mode) (insert "/*foo*/") (backward-char)
> > (c-context-line-break) (delete-char -2) (end-of-line)
> > (c-context-line-break))'

> > The second c-context-line-break occurs when point is *after* the comment,
> > so the /*foo*/ comment shouldn't be extended --- yet it is. The problem
> > appears to be some kind of cc-mode cache corruption. This recipe behaves
> > correctly:

> > $ emacs -Q --eval '(progn (c-mode) (insert "/*foo*/") (backward-char)
> > (c-context-line-break) (delete-char -2) (end-of-line) (c-before-change
> > (point-min) (point-max)) (c-after-change (point-min) (point-max) (1-
> > (point-max))) (c-context-line-break))'

> Thanks for the report.

> After a quick bit of edebugging, it seems to be an off-by-one error in
> some cache handling.  It shouldn't be too difficult to sort out.

It wasn't.  I've committed a simple patch for this, and I'm closing the
bug.

> -- 
> Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]