bug#43443: closed ([PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypandoc.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:43:56 +0200
with message-id <87imccviub.fsf@elephly.net>
and subject line Re: [bug#43443] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypandoc.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #43443,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypandoc.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
43443: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43443
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypandoc.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 16 Sep 2020 11:59:18 +0200
>
>
>
>
> * gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm (python-pypandoc): New variable.
> ---
>  gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm
> index 593bb3f468..24fc512178 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm
> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@
>    #:use-module (gnu packages gsasl)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages gstreamer)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages gtk)
> +  #:use-module (gnu packages haskell-xyz)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages icu4c)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages image)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages imagemagick)
> @@ -21979,3 +21980,39 @@ dates in almost any string formats commonly found on 
> web pages.")
>      (description "Safety checks installed dependencies for known 
> vulnerabilities.
>  By default it uses the open Python vulnerability database Safety DB.")
>    (license license:expat)))
> +
> +(define-public python-pypandoc
> +  (package
> +    (name "python-pypandoc")
> +    (version "1.5")
> +    (source
> +     (origin
> +       (method url-fetch)
> +       (uri (pypi-uri "pypandoc" version))
> +       (sha256
> +        (base32
> +         "1zvn9764cf7kkjkmr9gw6wc8adpk06qxr1rhxwa9pg0zmdvrk90l"))))
> +    (build-system python-build-system)
> +    (inputs
> +     `(("pandoc" ,ghc-pandoc)
> +       ("pandoc-citeproc" ,ghc-pandoc-citeproc)))
> +    (propagated-inputs
> +     `(("pip" ,python-pip)
> +       ("setuptools" ,python-setuptools)
> +       ("wheel" ,python-wheel)))
> +    (native-inputs
> +     `(("texlive" ,texlive)))
> +    (arguments
> +     `(#:phases
> +       (modify-phases %standard-phases
> +         (add-before 'check 'disable-tests
> +           (lambda _
> +             ;; Disable test requiring network access
> +             (substitute* "tests.py"
> +               (("test_basic_conversion_from_http_url")
> +                "skip_test_basic_conversion_from_http_url"))
> +             #t)))))
> +    (home-page "https://github.com/bebraw/pypandoc";)
> +    (synopsis "Python wrapper for pandoc.")
> +    (description "Thin Python wrapper for pandoc.")
> +    (license license:expat)))
> -- 
> 2.28.0
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: [bug#43443] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypandoc.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:43:56 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1
>
>
>
>
> Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net> writes:
>
> > Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
> >
> >> Looks good to me.  “guix lint python-pypandoc” says that we don’t need
> >> pip and setuptools as propagated-inputs, and I can confirm that the
> >> package builds fine without them.
> >>
> >> Is it okay to remove them?
> >
> > Sure! And I have to admit that I completely forgot to run lint.
> > Summer vacation made me forget some good habits!
>
> Heh, no problem!
>
> I pushed it with these changes to the “master” branch with commit
> 731354b8d7.
>
> -- 
> Ricardo
>
>
> --- End Message ---