|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | bug#43425: closed ([PATCH] gnu: openblas: Update to 0.3.10.) |
Date: | Fri, 18 Sep 2020 07:11:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:10:11 +0200 with message-id <87zh5n1rxo.fsf@gnu.org> and subject line Re: [bug#43425] [PATCH] gnu: openblas: Update to 0.3.10. has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #43425, regarding [PATCH] gnu: openblas: Update to 0.3.10. to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact help-debbugs@gnu.org.) -- 43425: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43425 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: [PATCH] gnu: openblas: Update to 0.3.10. Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 09:59:58 -0400 From 3b23f2a61b0a5b25389875441739a53bfe5d9aab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Greg Hogan <code@greghogan.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:52:50 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: openblas: Update to 0.3.10.
* gnu/packages/maths.scm (openblas): Update to 0.3.10 and fetch from github.
---
gnu/packages/maths.scm | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/maths.scm b/gnu/packages/maths.scm
index df4d39f900..6a1d772318 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/maths.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/maths.scm
@@ -3609,16 +3609,16 @@ parts of it.")
(define-public openblas
(package
(name "openblas")
- (version "0.3.9")
+ (version "0.3.10")
(source
(origin
(method url-fetch)
- (uri (string-append "mirror://sourceforge/openblas/v" version "/OpenBLAS%20"
- version "%20version.tar.gz"))
+ (uri (string-append "https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/archive/v"
+ version ".tar.gz"))
(file-name (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz"))
(sha256
(base32
- "14iz9xnrb9xiwgj84j94mc74gg0zn2vsy9fmsijxxma1n7dck4w3"))))
+ "14qndvg229w2jh2di6n7d8kvw343yafsmv1fzx0qd6vyz1sx5104"))))
(build-system gnu-build-system)
(arguments
`(#:test-target "test"
--
2.28.0
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: [bug#43425] [PATCH] gnu: openblas: Update to 0.3.10. Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:10:11 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Hey, > Thank you for the recommendation. I had changed the source to the > official github repo to enable the version check by the refresh > updater. Can the git tag not be regenerated in the same way as archive > uploads? New patch follows. Thanks for the updated version. Yes I guess it can happen but it's less likely. I added your copyright and edited a bit the commit message before applying. Mathieu -- https://othacehe.org
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |