emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#40947: closed (Add emacs-boon)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#40947: closed (Add emacs-boon)
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:23:01 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:22:38 +0100
with message-id <877dqlm7i9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
and subject line Re: [bug#40970] [PATCH] gnu: add emacs-boon
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #40970,
regarding Add emacs-boon
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
40970: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40970
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Add emacs-boon Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:57:48 -0600
Hi,

This patch adds the boon modal editing package

Attachment: 0001-Add-emacs-boon-package.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#40970] [PATCH] gnu: add emacs-boon Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:22:38 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> Elais Player <elais@fastmail.com> writes:
>
>> This patch adds the emacs-boon package with changes recommended by
>> Nicolas Goaziou.
>
> Thank you.
>
>> +    (description
>> +     "Boon is a complete package for modal editing, which is not Evil.
>> +Strong points:
>
> Nitpick: I suggest to use a complete sentence here.
>
>> +@itemize
>> +@item Ergonomic: common commands are easy to type.
>> +@item Emacs-friendly: Emacs conventions are respected as much as compatible
>> +with design goals. This means that Boon integrates well with existing Emacs
>> +infrastructure, and leverages it. Existing user configuration can often be
>> +re-used.
>> +@item Modular: No need to buy into the whole system: mix-and-match the parts
>
> "No need" -> "no need"
>
> Also, you need to put two spaces at the end of sentences in description.
>
> Otherwise, LGTM.
>
> You generated a new patch on top of the previous one. Could you merge
> both, fix the above, and send one last patch?

I pushed a new iteration of this patch. I'm closing this one.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]