--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Checksum mismatch on python-llvmlite patch |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Mar 2020 13:25:43 +0100 |
Hello,
python-llvmlite fails to build because it tries to download a patch that
has the wrong checksum.
Starting download of
/gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188-svml-VF.patch
From
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/numba/llvmlite/v0.30.0/conda-recipes/D47188-svml-VF.patch...
downloading from
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/numba/llvmlite/v0.30.0/conda-recipes/D47188-svml-VF.patch...
D47188-svml-VF.patch 73KiB 1.5MiB/s 00:00
[##################] 100.0%
sha256 hash mismatch for
/gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188-svml-VF.patch:
expected hash: 0wxhgb61k17f0zg2m0726sf3hppm41f8jar2kkg2n8sl5cnjj9mr
actual hash: 0dlr2kmzjrif0wgqql1s3f6pmmsa8fjwjpm08ni68wwvjjx2lcli
hash mismatch for store item
'/gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188-svml-VF.patch'
build of /gnu/store/vgni0s5mqdyc8pijaz1pdb6pirqd7ddh-D47188-svml-VF.patch.drv
failed
This is likely a regression from
6608727262f45d351c55cd1ae40414db7768a374 and would go unnoticed if you
already had the previous patch in your store with the expected checksum.
I tried to simply update the patch, but the updated patch fails to apply
on LLVM 7, and the *other* patch fails to apply if I change to LLVM 8.
There is a new version of python-llvmlite out too, but no changes to the
patches.
Not sure what to do from here, help wanted!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#40073: Checksum mismatch on python-llvmlite patch |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Nov 2020 23:35:51 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> writes:
> Hello,
>
> python-llvmlite fails to build because it tries to download a patch that
> has the wrong checksum.
>
> Starting download of
> /gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188-svml-VF.patch
> From
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/numba/llvmlite/v0.30.0/conda-recipes/D47188-svml-VF.patch...
> downloading from
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/numba/llvmlite/v0.30.0/conda-recipes/D47188-svml-VF.patch...
> D47188-svml-VF.patch 73KiB 1.5MiB/s 00:00
> [##################] 100.0%
> sha256 hash mismatch for
> /gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188-svml-VF.patch:
> expected hash: 0wxhgb61k17f0zg2m0726sf3hppm41f8jar2kkg2n8sl5cnjj9mr
> actual hash: 0dlr2kmzjrif0wgqql1s3f6pmmsa8fjwjpm08ni68wwvjjx2lcli
> hash mismatch for store item
> '/gnu/store/hb3kk3d4nngxglfdflf99incbhmbw14h-D47188-svml-VF.patch'
> build of /gnu/store/vgni0s5mqdyc8pijaz1pdb6pirqd7ddh-D47188-svml-VF.patch.drv
> failed
>
> This is likely a regression from
> 6608727262f45d351c55cd1ae40414db7768a374 and would go unnoticed if you
> already had the previous patch in your store with the expected checksum.
>
> I tried to simply update the patch, but the updated patch fails to apply
> on LLVM 7, and the *other* patch fails to apply if I change to LLVM 8.
>
> There is a new version of python-llvmlite out too, but no changes to the
> patches.
>
> Not sure what to do from here, help wanted!
I fixed this in commit 8a34f292923cc4b6487e39570a9c6e0526b094e1, earlier
this month.
Closing,
Thanks for the report!
Maxim
--- End Message ---