emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#43015: closed (git-fetched packages' working copy is not writable)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#43015: closed (git-fetched packages' working copy is not writable)
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:42:01 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 04 Feb 2021 07:41:10 -0500
with message-id <87k0rongyh.fsf@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#43015: git-fetched packages' working copy is not 
writable
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #43015,
regarding git-fetched packages' working copy is not writable
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
43015: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43015
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: git-fetched packages' working copy is not writable Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:13:59 +0200
Hi,

the working copy of a package build when the package was git-fetched is not
writable.

On the other hand, if it's url-fetched, it's perfectly writable.

Shall we fix this on core-updates ?

Attachment: pgpPNC2k92B2E.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#43015: git-fetched packages' working copy is not writable Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 07:41:10 -0500 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
Hello,

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:

> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:13:59AM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> the working copy of a package build when the package was git-fetched is not
>> writable.
>> 
>> On the other hand, if it's url-fetched, it's perfectly writable.
>> 
>> Shall we fix this on core-updates ?
>
> (ins)efraim@E5400 ~/workspace/guix$ git grep make-files-writable | grep 
> unpack | grep gnu/packages
> gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm:         (add-after 'unpack 
> 'make-files-writable
> gnu/packages/code.scm:                    (add-after 'unpack 
> 'make-files-writable
> gnu/packages/djvu.scm:         (add-after 'unpack 'make-files-writable
> gnu/packages/java.scm:         (add-after 'unpack 'make-files-writable
> gnu/packages/java.scm:         (add-after 'unpack 'make-files-writable
> gnu/packages/java.scm:         (add-after 'unpack 'make-files-writable
> gnu/packages/java.scm:         (add-after 'unpack 'make-files-writable
> gnu/packages/machine-learning.scm:         (add-after 'unpack 
> 'make-files-writable
> gnu/packages/ocaml.scm:         (add-after 'unpack 'make-files-writable
> gnu/packages/ruby.scm:                    (add-after 'unpack 
> 'make-files-writable
>
> My only concern would be if there were files which weren't supposed to
> be writable. We're building the package, not making changes to be
> submitted upstream or anything, so I don't see that as being a reason to
> hold back.
>
> I'm in favor

I've included the fix as part as the unpack phase, and pushed to
core-updates as commit 6129ebddbd.

Thanks for the report!

Closing.

Maxim


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]