emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#36117: closed (qemu-binfmt with non-native chroot)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#36117: closed (qemu-binfmt with non-native chroot)
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 22:08:02 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:07:27 -0400
with message-id <87eeggrrz4.fsf_-_@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#36117: qemu-binfmt with non-native chroot
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #36117,
regarding qemu-binfmt with non-native chroot
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
36117: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36117
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: qemu-binfmt with non-native chroot Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2019 10:55:25 -0700
I've been trying to use qemu-binfmt-service-type to build a non-native
chroot of a Debian system on Guix... because, well... because!

In Debian, this works with the qemu-user-static package, where the
binfmt sets these flags:

  $ cat /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc/qemu-aarch64
  enabled
  interpreter /usr/bin/qemu-aarch64-static
  flags: OCF
  offset 0
  magic 7f454c460201010000000000000000000200b700
  mask ffffffffffffff00fffffffffffffffffeffffff

In particular, the F flag allows the host system binaries to be used as
the interpreter inside the chroot. But apparently, this only works with
static-built qemu targets, according to the linux's
Documentation/admin-guide/binfmt-misc.rst.

On Guix there are no flags set, and the binary used is a dynamically
linked executable:

  $ cat /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc/qemu-aarch64
  enabled
  interpreter
  /gnu/store/sw2rrqmjij73wcy3ajd47ypvmzh12yz6-qemu-3.1.0/bin/qemu-aarch64
  flags:
  offset 0
  magic 7f454c460201010000000000000000000200b700
  mask ffffffffffffff00fffffffffffffffffeffffff


So there are (at least) two things needed to make this work on Guix:

* A way to set the flags on qemu-binfmt-service-type.

* A static build of qemu-user targets

* A way to set which qemu to use for qemu-binfmt-service-type.

The *three* things are...


With this working correctly foreign-architecture chroots would become
trivial:

  # on an amd64 host:
  $ debootstrap --arch=arm64 buster buster-chroot http://deb.debian.org/debian
  ...
  $ chroot buster-chroot /bin/bash


Enabling qemu-binfmt-service-type to operate in this way would obviate
the need for the "guix-support?" qemu-binfmt-configuration option, as
you could simply assemble the build environment without having to
include all of qemu's dependencies in the container.

It's a pretty magical feature.


live well,
  vagrant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#36117: qemu-binfmt with non-native chroot Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:07:27 -0400 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
Hi,

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:

> Hello again,
>
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>>  ;; Platforms that QEMU can emulate.
>>> -(define-record-type <qemu-platform>
>>> -  (qemu-platform name family magic mask)
>>> +(define-record-type* <qemu-platform>
>>
>> Since this is for internal consumption, I’m in favor of keeping plain
>> ‘define-record-type’.  Also, I don’t think the “F” flag belongs here,
>> it’s mostly orthogonal.
>
> Even though it's still internal for now, the intent here was to allow
> the advanced users (those who would use (@@ ...) to access what they
> need) to configure the qemu-platform objects should they have special
> needs for it.
>
> I also don't think the flags belong to a qemu-platform object, but the
> same can be said for the magic field.  The most elegant thing would be
> to have a binfmt_misc service which we would then extend for QEMU, but
> that's more work and the use cases appear to be rare outside of QEMU (I
> can only think of WINE).  If you feel strongly about it I can revert
> those hunks and hard-coded the F flag.
>
>>>  (define qemu-binfmt-service-type
>>>    ;; TODO: Make a separate binfmt_misc service out of this?
>>>    (service-type (name 'qemu-binfmt)
>>> @@ -800,9 +833,7 @@ given QEMU package."
>>>                                            (const
>>>                                             (list 
>>> %binary-format-file-system)))
>>>                         (service-extension shepherd-root-service-type
>>> -                                          qemu-binfmt-shepherd-services)
>>> -                       (service-extension guix-service-type
>>> -                                          qemu-binfmt-guix-chroot)))
>>> +                                          qemu-binfmt-shepherd-services)))
>>
>> As discussed on IRC, the downside of this approach is increased disk and
>> memory footprint (those big binaries have to be loaded in memory).
>
> The 'big' binaries are not that bigger than what we already have.  For a
> typical one:
>
> $ du -h {/gnu/store/7w04gv6m92n40dainn4s6xr3l20r90xw-qemu-5.1.0,\
>   /gnu/store/wqh2dyskzkl4vjn6harclyl317h4vfaf-qemu-5.1.0-static}/bin/qemu-arm
>
> 4.6M    /gnu/store/7w04gv6m92n40dainn4s6xr3l20r90xw-qemu-5.1.0/bin/qemu-arm
> 6.4M    
> /gnu/store/wqh2dyskzkl4vjn6harclyl317h4vfaf-qemu-5.1.0-static/bin/qemu-arm
>
> Only the registered QEMU architectures would be preloaded; so if you
> enable 5, the increase it at worst ~ 30 MiB.  Nothing too worrying on
> machines that should be quite capable for transparent emulation
> purposes, in my opinion.
>
>> One possibility would be to add an option to choose between this and the
>> current approach, but maybe it’s not worth the maintenance trouble.
>
> I would rather K.I.S.S., with this only case that works everywhere and
> thus doesn't surprise anyone.
>
>> Thanks for fixing this issue!
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
> Maxim

I went ahead and pushed this change to master alongside the update to
QEMU 5.2.0.

If there are improvements/changes to be made, we can pick it up from
there!

Closing,

Maxim


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]