bug#47027: closed (Disarchive package)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:45:51 -0400
with message-id <87a6quo4u8.fsf_-_@ngyro.com>
and subject line Re: bug#47027: Disarchive package
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #47027,
regarding Disarchive package
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
47027: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=47027
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Disarchive package
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:37:31 -0500
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hi Guix,
>
> These patches add Disarchive and one of its dependencies,
> Guile-QuickCheck.
>
> They are pretty straight forward, but I am a little shaky about using
> “guile-3.0-latest”, so I would appreciate another pair of eyes.  The
> reason it’s there is because Disarchive opportunistically uses the SWH
> code from Guix if it is available.  If I use plain “guile-3.0”, I get
> “incompatible bytecode” errors when restoring archives from SWH.
>
> TIA!
>
>
> -- Tim
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#47027: Disarchive package
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:45:51 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hey,
>
> Timothy Sample <samplet@ngyro.com> writes:
>
> > Right now, I am finishing one last UI tweak (stopping Disarchive from
> > printing a backtrace when the directory does not exist in the SWH
> > archive).  Then, I will release 0.2.0 and push this patch with the
> > new version.
>
> Done and pushed!
>
> > Then – finally – we can talk about using it.
>
> See <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47336>.
>
>
> -- Tim
>
>
> --- End Message ---