emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#42885: closed ([PATCH 0/4] gnu: calibre: Update to 4.22.0.)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#42885: closed ([PATCH 0/4] gnu: calibre: Update to 4.22.0.)
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 20:13:01 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 9 Apr 2021 16:12:43 -0400
with message-id <YHC1OyCtLMnUMmyx@jasmine.lan>
and subject line Re: [bug#42885] [PATCH 23/27] gnu: calibre: Update to 5.13.0.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #42885,
regarding [PATCH 0/4] gnu: calibre: Update to 4.22.0.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
42885: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=42885
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH 0/4] gnu: calibre: Update to 4.22.0. Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 16:55:10 +1000




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#42885] [PATCH 23/27] gnu: calibre: Update to 5.13.0. Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 16:12:43 -0400
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 01:17:43PM +0200, Brendan Tildesley wrote:
> 
> > On 04/08/2021 6:28 AM Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
> > 
> >  
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 06:11:55AM +0200, Brendan Tildesley wrote:
> > > Well, using a python-pyqt with the python-sip input set back to 
> > > python-sip-4 fixes it. Do we want to commit to getting it working with 
> > > python-sip@5. I'm still playing around with it trying to get it to build
> > 
> > I think it's okay to use python-sip-4, unless you want to hunt down this
> > bug.
> 
> Fixed I think.
> Also I deleted the unused python2-sip (in my notabug)

Alright, I pushed as f68bcc1bc3aa0a8d1829e2eb5d9ef256c817c17c

Thank you very much for tackling this complicated upgrade of such an
important package!


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]