--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
[PATCH] gnu: guile-wisp: Update to 1.0.5. |
Date: |
Sun, 2 May 2021 18:08:56 +0200 |
* gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm (guile-wisp): Update to 1.0.5.
[license]: Add license:expat and clarify conditions.
---
gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm
index 8de2a310b6..f3fd58d48a 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm
@@ -1778,7 +1778,7 @@ user which package sets would they like to install from
it.")
(define-public guile-wisp
(package
(name "guile-wisp")
- (version "1.0.4")
+ (version "1.0.5")
(source (origin
(method hg-fetch)
(uri (hg-reference
@@ -1787,7 +1787,7 @@ user which package sets would they like to install from
it.")
(file-name (git-file-name name version))
(sha256
(base32
- "0d54l2s8qsfckg0imbx40npggi6f867hn7fsy0jjsmxz4b8a3949"))))
+ "00iknn03gf421gg3061g35fbraqrkcqypkrfn10rhlgg6j0lgk67"))))
(build-system gnu-build-system)
(arguments
`(#:modules ((guix build gnu-build-system)
@@ -1854,7 +1854,8 @@ user which package sets would they like to install from
it.")
(description "Wisp is a syntax for Guile which provides a Python-like
whitespace-significant language. It may be easier on the eyes for some
users and in some situations.")
- (license license:gpl3+)))
+ (license (list license:gpl3+ ; the project as a whole
+ license:expat)))) ; the language spec (see also SRFI 119)
(define-public guile2.2-wisp
(package
--
2.31.1
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#48163: [PATCH] gnu: guile-wisp: Update to 1.0.5. |
Date: |
Mon, 03 May 2021 18:27:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.34.2 |
Am Montag, den 03.05.2021, 17:55 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Hi!
>
> Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> skribis:
>
> > * gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm (guile-wisp): Update to 1.0.5.
> > [license]: Add license:expat and clarify conditions.
>
> If ‘gwl’ still builds fine after this, go for it!
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
Done and pushed.
Unfortunately, I don't have a workflow at hand to test whether it is
functionally equivalent, but from what I understand the update merely
clarified licensing terms, so all your ("you" meaning all Guix users)
workflows should still function as they did before.
Regards,
Leo
--- End Message ---