|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | bug#39601: closed (srfi library naming in r7rs) |
Date: | Tue, 02 Nov 2021 17:54:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Tue, 2 Nov 2021 18:53:10 +0100 with message-id <0F84CF68-B762-4B4A-B580-F7E17E8353E2@sarc.name> and subject line Re: bug#39601: srfi library naming in r7rs has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #39601, regarding srfi library naming in r7rs to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact help-debbugs@gnu.org.) -- 39601: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=39601 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: srfi library naming in r7rs Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:48:20 +0700 I'm running Guile 3.0.0 and very new to Guile. Forgive me if this is not the right place to report (or whether I should do more search, where?, before reporting) It seems like in r7rs mode, srfi libraries are still named in "Guile style", (srfi srfi-1). I can't find a place in r7rs-small to spell out "srfi followed by a number". But it seems every other r7rs scheme goes with (srfi 1) instead. Should Guile support this naming convention as well? It certainly makes it easier to reuse external libraries. -- Duy
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#39601: srfi library naming in r7rs Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 18:53:10 +0100 Applied in a960d7869bc82bb56d5446ece01b8efff9b15fef. Thank you!
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |