emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#39601: closed (srfi library naming in r7rs)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#39601: closed (srfi library naming in r7rs)
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 17:54:02 +0000

Your message dated Tue, 2 Nov 2021 18:53:10 +0100
with message-id <0F84CF68-B762-4B4A-B580-F7E17E8353E2@sarc.name>
and subject line Re: bug#39601: srfi library naming in r7rs
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #39601,
regarding srfi library naming in r7rs
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
39601: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=39601
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: srfi library naming in r7rs Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:48:20 +0700
I'm running Guile 3.0.0 and very new to Guile. Forgive me if this is
not the right place to report (or whether I should do more search,
where?, before reporting)

It seems like in r7rs mode, srfi libraries are still named in "Guile
style", (srfi srfi-1). I can't find a place in r7rs-small to spell out
"srfi followed by a number". But it seems every other r7rs scheme goes
with (srfi 1) instead. Should Guile support this naming convention as
well? It certainly makes it easier to reuse external libraries.
-- 
Duy



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#39601: srfi library naming in r7rs Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 18:53:10 +0100
Applied in a960d7869bc82bb56d5446ece01b8efff9b15fef. Thank you!



--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]