--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
[PATCH 0/2] gnu: Add bloomberg-bde. |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Nov 2021 15:12:31 -0400 |
This patchset adds Bloomberg's BDE C++ library as well as the bde-tools dependency.
0002-gnu-Add-bloomberg-bde.patch
Description: Binary data
0001-gnu-Add-bloomberg-bde-tools.patch
Description: Binary data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: [bug#51592] [PATCH 0/2] gnu: Add bloomberg-bde. |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Feb 2022 18:19:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Greg,
Greg Hogan <code@greghogan.com> skribis:
> From fa9d62133973705b08f4f0952cf55189ff9cdb7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Greg Hogan <code@greghogan.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 15:20:51 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add bloomberg-bde-tools.
>
> * gnu/packages/cpp.scm (bloomberg-bde-tools): New variable.
> From 5b6114f4ee2c3801858d2984d706a490cd34f50e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Greg Hogan <code@greghogan.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 15:22:19 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add bloomberg-bde.
>
> * gnu/packages/cpp.scm (bloomberg-bde): New variable.
Applied both, sorry for the delay!
However, I hit a test failure in one case:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
513/950 Test #513: bslh_defaultseededhashalgorithm.t ..................
Passed 0.05 sec
Start 514: bslh_fibonaccibadhashwrapper.t
514/950 Test #514: bslh_fibonaccibadhashwrapper.t .....................
Passed 0.05 sec
Start 515: bslh_hash.t
515/950 Test #515: bslh_hash.t
........................................***Failed 0.05 sec
[11:23:07] TEST START
[11:23:07] CASE 1: SUCCESS
[11:23:07] CASE 2: SUCCESS
[11:23:07] CASE 3: FAILURE (rc 1)
TEST
/tmp/guix-build-bloomberg-bde-3.98.0.0.drv-0/source/groups/bsl/bslh/bslh_hash.t.cpp
CASE 3
1463: 1463 alg.getLength(): 10 size: 16
Error, non-zero test status = 1.
Error
/tmp/guix-build-bloomberg-bde-3.98.0.0.drv-0/source/groups/bsl/bslh/bslh_hash.t.cpp(1463):
alg.getLength() == size (failed)
[11:23:07] CASE 4: SUCCESS
[11:23:07] CASE 5: SUCCESS
[11:23:07] CASE 6: SUCCESS
[11:23:07] CASE 7: SUCCESS
[11:23:07] CASE 8: SUCCESS
Start 516: bslh_hashoptional.t
516/950 Test #516: bslh_hashoptional.t ................................
Passed 0.05 sec
Start 517: bslh_hashtuple.t
517/950 Test #517: bslh_hashtuple.t ...................................
Passed 0.05 sec
Start 518: bslh_hashvariant.t
518/950 Test #518: bslh_hashvariant.t .................................
Passed 0.05 sec
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
It’d be worth monitoring ci.guix to see if it happens reproducibly.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
--- End Message ---