emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#51592: closed ([PATCH 0/2] gnu: Add bloomberg-bde.)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#51592: closed ([PATCH 0/2] gnu: Add bloomberg-bde.)
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 17:20:02 +0000

Your message dated Tue, 08 Feb 2022 18:19:12 +0100
with message-id <878rul9sz3.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: [bug#51592] [PATCH 0/2] gnu: Add bloomberg-bde.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #51592,
regarding [PATCH 0/2] gnu: Add bloomberg-bde.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
51592: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=51592
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH 0/2] gnu: Add bloomberg-bde. Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 15:12:31 -0400
This patchset adds Bloomberg's BDE C++ library as well as the bde-tools dependency.

Attachment: 0002-gnu-Add-bloomberg-bde.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: 0001-gnu-Add-bloomberg-bde-tools.patch
Description: Binary data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#51592] [PATCH 0/2] gnu: Add bloomberg-bde. Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 18:19:12 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
Hi Greg,

Greg Hogan <code@greghogan.com> skribis:

> From fa9d62133973705b08f4f0952cf55189ff9cdb7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Greg Hogan <code@greghogan.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 15:20:51 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add bloomberg-bde-tools.
>
> * gnu/packages/cpp.scm (bloomberg-bde-tools): New variable.

> From 5b6114f4ee2c3801858d2984d706a490cd34f50e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Greg Hogan <code@greghogan.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 15:22:19 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add bloomberg-bde.
>
> * gnu/packages/cpp.scm (bloomberg-bde): New variable.

Applied both, sorry for the delay!

However, I hit a test failure in one case:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
513/950 Test #513: bslh_defaultseededhashalgorithm.t ..................   
Passed    0.05 sec
        Start 514: bslh_fibonaccibadhashwrapper.t
514/950 Test #514: bslh_fibonaccibadhashwrapper.t .....................   
Passed    0.05 sec
        Start 515: bslh_hash.t
515/950 Test #515: bslh_hash.t 
........................................***Failed    0.05 sec
[11:23:07] TEST START
[11:23:07] CASE  1: SUCCESS
[11:23:07] CASE  2: SUCCESS
[11:23:07] CASE  3: FAILURE (rc 1)
TEST 
/tmp/guix-build-bloomberg-bde-3.98.0.0.drv-0/source/groups/bsl/bslh/bslh_hash.t.cpp
 CASE 3
1463: 1463      alg.getLength(): 10     size: 16
Error, non-zero test status = 1.
Error 
/tmp/guix-build-bloomberg-bde-3.98.0.0.drv-0/source/groups/bsl/bslh/bslh_hash.t.cpp(1463):
 alg.getLength() == size    (failed)

[11:23:07] CASE  4: SUCCESS
[11:23:07] CASE  5: SUCCESS
[11:23:07] CASE  6: SUCCESS
[11:23:07] CASE  7: SUCCESS
[11:23:07] CASE  8: SUCCESS

        Start 516: bslh_hashoptional.t
516/950 Test #516: bslh_hashoptional.t ................................   
Passed    0.05 sec
        Start 517: bslh_hashtuple.t
517/950 Test #517: bslh_hashtuple.t ...................................   
Passed    0.05 sec
        Start 518: bslh_hashvariant.t
518/950 Test #518: bslh_hashvariant.t .................................   
Passed    0.05 sec
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

It’d be worth monitoring ci.guix to see if it happens reproducibly.

Thanks,
Ludo’.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]