emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#54019: closed ([PATCH] doc: Fix 'setuid-program' example.)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#54019: closed ([PATCH] doc: Fix 'setuid-program' example.)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 04:18:01 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 23 Feb 2022 23:17:37 -0500
with message-id <87fso8lwym.fsf@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#54019: [PATCH] doc: Fix 'setuid-program' example.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #54019,
regarding [PATCH] doc: Fix 'setuid-program' example.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
54019: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=54019
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] doc: Fix 'setuid-program' example. Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 01:18:40 +0000
On #guix an error was reported in adding a setuid-program, but which followed 
the example in the manual. Looks like %setuid-programs was moved out a level in 
1b87dc2f2a897f5fe0b3f8984c2544335ac87b56. The indentation was misleading 
(implying %setuid-programs was in the list sexp) previous to that commit.

I believe this should be the correct format, and Kolev (who had the 
setuid-program problem on #guix) reported moving the paren fixed the error.

Please see the attached patch. I did not add a copyright line for fixing this 
typo, but if it should be added, please do.

Thanks!
John

Attachment: 0001-doc-Fix-setuid-program-example.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#54019: [PATCH] doc: Fix 'setuid-program' example. Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 23:17:37 -0500 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
Hello,

John Kehayias <john.kehayias@protonmail.com> writes:

> On #guix an error was reported in adding a setuid-program, but which
> followed the example in the manual. Looks like %setuid-programs was
> moved out a level in 1b87dc2f2a897f5fe0b3f8984c2544335ac87b56. The
> indentation was misleading (implying %setuid-programs was in the list
> sexp) previous to that commit.
>
> I believe this should be the correct format, and Kolev (who had the
> setuid-program problem on #guix) reported moving the paren fixed the
> error.
>
> Please see the attached patch. I did not add a copyright line for
> fixing this typo, but if it should be added, please do.

It's not needed, no (as per the <= 10 changed lines rule of thumb).

Pushed as 50311f338f.

Thanks to all involved :-).

Maxim


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]