[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Processed (with 6 errors): Re: bug#55205: 28.1.50; completion--replace i
From: |
GNU bug tracker automated control server |
Subject: |
Processed (with 6 errors): Re: bug#55205: 28.1.50; completion--replace illegally mutates completion candidates |
Date: |
Mon, 02 May 2022 17:20:03 -0400 |
Processing commands for control@debbugs.gnu.org:
> Eli Zaretskii [2022-05-02 19:53:08] wrote:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> > Why is it justified in this case? How is this case different from any
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> > other case?
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> I don't think it's different from any other. It's generally considered
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> a bug when a function uses things like `sort`, `nconc, or `nreverse on
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
Too many unknown commands, stopping here.
No commands successfully parsed; sending the help text(s).
Sending instructions for control@debbugs.gnu.org in separate message.
Please contact help-debbugs@gnu.org if you need assistance.
GNU bugs database, https://debbugs.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Processed (with 6 errors): Re: bug#55205: 28.1.50; completion--replace illegally mutates completion candidates,
GNU bug tracker automated control server <=