bug#55602: closed ([PATCH 0/2] Move (gnu platform) and friends to guix, and fix linux module build system.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 25 May 2022 09:31:07 +0200
with message-id <877d6axe4k.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#55602: [PATCH 0/2] Move (gnu platform) and friends to 
guix, and fix linux module build system.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #55602,
regarding [PATCH 0/2] Move (gnu platform) and friends to guix, and fix linux 
module build system.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
55602: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=55602
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH 0/2] Move (gnu platform) and friends to guix, and fix linux module build system.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 23 May 2022 22:29:02 +0200
>
>
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> The linux-module-build-system broke because we're now using platform
> records, and the accessor platform-glibc-dynamic-linker is syntax.
> The build system cannot invoke it through module-ref shenanigans (done
> previously to avoid some circular dependencies), because as everyone
> knows syntax expands at compile/expand-time only.  Since the platform
> code has moved to its own cozy (gnu platform) in the meantime, I
> figured that it could very well be simply use-module'd, but then it'd
> have to end up in (guix ...) to follow the rule that guix modules
> should never directly use-module gnu modules.  Hence this quite big
> patchset.
>
> This addresses the same issue as [1].
>
> [1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/55591
>
> Best,
> Josselin Poiret (2):
>   Move (gnu platform) and (gnu platforms ...) to guix/.
>   build-system: linux-module: Directly use-module (guix platform).
>
>  doc/guix.texi                       | 2 +-
>  etc/release-manifest.scm            | 2 +-
>  gnu/ci.scm                          | 2 +-
>  gnu/image.scm                       | 2 +-
>  gnu/local.mk                        | 8 --------
>  gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm     | 2 +-
>  gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm          | 2 +-
>  gnu/packages/cross-base.scm         | 2 +-
>  gnu/packages/instrumentation.scm    | 2 +-
>  gnu/packages/linux.scm              | 2 +-
>  gnu/system/image.scm                | 2 +-
>  gnu/system/images/hurd.scm          | 2 +-
>  gnu/system/images/novena.scm        | 2 +-
>  gnu/system/images/pine64.scm        | 2 +-
>  gnu/system/images/pinebook-pro.scm  | 2 +-
>  gnu/system/images/rock64.scm        | 2 +-
>  guix/build-system/linux-module.scm  | 4 ++--
>  {gnu => guix}/platform.scm          | 4 ++--
>  {gnu => guix}/platforms/arm.scm     | 5 ++---
>  {gnu => guix}/platforms/hurd.scm    | 5 ++---
>  {gnu => guix}/platforms/mips.scm    | 5 ++---
>  {gnu => guix}/platforms/powerpc.scm | 5 ++---
>  {gnu => guix}/platforms/riscv.scm   | 5 ++---
>  {gnu => guix}/platforms/s390.scm    | 5 ++---
>  {gnu => guix}/platforms/x86.scm     | 5 ++---
>  guix/scripts/build.scm              | 2 +-
>  guix/scripts/system.scm             | 2 +-
>  guix/self.scm                       | 2 +-
>  28 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>  rename {gnu => guix}/platform.scm (98%)
>  rename {gnu => guix}/platforms/arm.scm (92%)
>  rename {gnu => guix}/platforms/hurd.scm (90%)
>  rename {gnu => guix}/platforms/mips.scm (90%)
>  rename {gnu => guix}/platforms/powerpc.scm (92%)
>  rename {gnu => guix}/platforms/riscv.scm (91%)
>  rename {gnu => guix}/platforms/s390.scm (90%)
>  rename {gnu => guix}/platforms/x86.scm (94%)
>
> -- 
> 2.36.0
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#55602: [PATCH 0/2] Move (gnu platform) and friends to guix, and fix linux module build system.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 25 May 2022 09:31:07 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> > knows syntax expands at compile/expand-time only.  Since the platform
> > code has moved to its own cozy (gnu platform) in the meantime, I
> > figured that it could very well be simply use-module'd, but then it'd
> > have to end up in (guix ...) to follow the rule that guix modules
> > should never directly use-module gnu modules.  Hence this quite big
> > patchset.
>
> Oops sorry for not noticing it, pushed!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mathieu
>
>
> --- End Message ---