[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#56846: closed ([PATCH] FeatherNotes package )

From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#56846: closed ([PATCH] FeatherNotes package )
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 01:24:01 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 04 Aug 2022 09:23:20 +0800
with message-id <87edxw2453.fsf_-_@envs.net>
and subject line Re: bug#56846: [PATCH] FeatherNotes package 
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #56846,
regarding [PATCH] FeatherNotes package 
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact

56846: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=56846
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] FeatherNotes package Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2022 01:50:23 +0300

Here is my patch to add FeatherNotes package to guix. I upstream it from 
PantherX channel, hence 3 copyright lines.
I build it against Qt5 as Qt6 support in FeatherNotes is experimental and is 
not recommended for daily usage yet.

Thank you in advance for your feedback.
Have a nice day!

Attachment: 0001-gnu-feathernotes-new-package.patch
Description: Binary data

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#56846: [PATCH] FeatherNotes package Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 09:23:20 +0800 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux)
Pavel Shlyak <p.shlyak@pantherx.org> writes:

>> Maybe "notes manager" is better than "notes-manager"?
> I copied the this from the original README 
> (https://github.com/tsujan/FeatherNotes/blob/master/README.md)
>> Why here are 2020 and 2021 changes?
> Because I upstream this package from another repo where it was packaged long 
> time ago.
>> Seem missing a "," after "editable tablesĀ».
> Yes
>> When adding a new package, the "tradition" is:
> I would be happy if it was edited during merge.

Done, thank you!

--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]