bug#59726: closed ([PATCH 0/2] gnu: g-wrap: Build with Guile 3.0.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 03 Dec 2022 17:04:05 +0800
with message-id <875yesdfhz.fsf@qq.com>
and subject line Re: bug#59726: [PATCH 0/2] gnu: g-wrap: Build with Guile 3.0.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #59726,
regarding [PATCH 0/2] gnu: g-wrap: Build with Guile 3.0.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
59726: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=59726
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH 0/2] gnu: g-wrap: Build with Guile 3.0.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu,  1 Dec 2022 00:25:40 +0800
>
>
>
>
> this patchs make g-wrap build with guile-3.0 and use gexp.
>
> Zheng Junjie (2):
>   gnu: g-wrap: Build with Guile 3.0.
>   gnu: g-wrap: Use gexp.
>
>  gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: f0ee77a17ea328e9909570bc72ab1f6bae363dab
> -- 
> 2.38.1
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#59726: [PATCH 0/2] gnu: g-wrap: Build with Guile 3.0.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 03 Dec 2022 17:04:05 +0800
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> mu4e 1.8.11; emacs 29.0.50
>
>
>
>
> ok. close.
>
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Z572 <873216071@qq.com> skribis:
> >
> >> * gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm(g-wrap)[source]: Modify configure to add Guile
> >> 3.0 support. move Modify configure guilemoduledir to it. dons't use removed
> >> api.
> >>
> >> [inputs]: add Guile 3.0, indent.
> >> [native-inputs]: add Guile 3.0.
> >> [propagated-inputs]: add libffi, remove guile-2.2.
> >> [arguments]:
> >> <#:configure-flags>: remove it.
> >> <#:parallel-build?>: set it to #f.
> >> <#:make-flags>: set it to '("GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0)".
> >> <#:phases>: add set-indent-program-path phase, remove pre-configure phase.
> >
> > G-Wrap has only one user, Guile-GNOME, which is stuck on Guile 2.2.
> > Thus I think G-Wrap has to remain on 2.2.
> >
> > Besides, G-Wrap has been unmaintained for some time and there are other,
> > more convenient ways to write bindings these days.  I think we can leave
> > it as is.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Ludo’.
>
>
> -- 
> over
>
>
> --- End Message ---