bug#60137: closed ([PATCH] ; Put built-in modes first for eglot-server-programs)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2022 18:46:21 +0000
with message-id 
<xJyCdrlZEwzKYH6tmEqunjxIVePjHmgNJWiX-37lcvm5cx1EK2f7PWIdpGnSY1yVVGxLrJyA0WAa4NRkO2FAh_9F8C32F8f8qIUWQy4Fqas=@rjt.dev>
and subject line Re: bug#60137: [PATCH] ; Put built-in modes first for  
eglot-server-programs
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #60137,
regarding [PATCH] ; Put built-in modes first for eglot-server-programs
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
60137: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=60137
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] ; Put built-in modes first for eglot-server-programs Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 02:48:19 +0000

Per Stefan's suggestion.

0001-Put-built-in-modes-first-for-eglot-server-programs.patch
Description: Text Data

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#60137: [PATCH] ; Put built-in modes first for  eglot-server-programs
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 18 Dec 2022 18:46:21 +0000
>
>
>
>
> On Sunday, December 18th, 2022 at 03:22, Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Randy Taylor dev@rjt.dev writes:
> > 
> > > On Saturday, December 17th, 2022 at 18:44, Yuan Fu casouri@gmail.com wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Randy Taylor dev@rjt.dev writes:
> > > > 
> > > > > Per Stefan's suggestion.
> > > > 
> > > > Does the ordering matter? CC’d Stefan.
> > > > 
> > > > Yuan
> > > 
> > > Nope, Stefan's suggestion was (from Bug#60105, which I probably should've 
> > > included in the initial bug):
> > > 
> > > > This is a nit, but I think it might make more sense to users if we put
> > > > the built-in mode first in the list. After all, the one we ship with
> > > > Emacs is, or will be, the standard mode.
> > > 
> > > It makes sense to me, hence the patch.
> > > 
> > > I've CC'd João since eglot is his baby.
> > 
> > 
> > IMHO, if it doesn’t matter, there is no need to add a commit to the
> > history for it. Stefan probably mentioned it because it was in a patch.
> > 
> > 
> > Yuan
> > 
>
> I just thought it would be nice to keep everything consistent.
>
> Closing since there's no interest.
>
>
> --- End Message ---