|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | bug#60290: closed (Manual: Is address@hidden valid?) |
Date: | Sat, 24 Dec 2022 10:24:01 +0000 |
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2022 11:23:23 +0100 with message-id <1008bf0bb3f356a9f72cf51c22518162@tobias.gr> and subject line Re: bug#60290: Manual: Is guix-patches@debbugs.gnu.org valid? has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #60290, regarding Manual: Is guix-patches@debbugs.gnu.org valid? to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact help-debbugs@gnu.org.) -- 60290: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=60290 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Manual: Is address@hidden valid? Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 23:35:15 +0100 Hi, If I send patches to guix-patches@gnu.org, everything works as intended. However if I send them to guix-patches@debbugs.gnu.org, I can wait days and I get no confirmation at all. This second address was found in the following command inside the Guix devel manual: > $ git send-email outgoing/0000-cover-letter.patch -a \ > --to=guix-patches@debbugs.gnu.org \ > [...] It's in the "Multiple Patches" subsection of the "Sending a patch Serie" section of "Submitting Patches". Denis.pgp0SriulAwnm.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#60290: Manual: Is address@hidden valid? Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 11:23:23 +0100 Nope. Fixed. Thanks! T G-R Sent from a Web browser. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |