bug#60218: closed ([PATCH 0/2] New teams.scm 'get-maintainer' command (for integration with patman))

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 28 Dec 2022 15:42:03 -0500
with message-id <87a6375kh0.fsf@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#60218: [PATCH 0/2] New teams.scm 'get-maintainer' 
command (for integration with patman)
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #60218,
regarding [PATCH 0/2] New teams.scm 'get-maintainer' command (for integration 
with patman)
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
60218: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=60218
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH 0/2] New teams.scm 'get-maintainer' command (for integration with patman)
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 20 Dec 2022 08:58:10 -0500
>
>
>
>
> Along with the correct '.patman' configuration file for Guix, this makes it
> possible to invoke the 'patman' command and have it add all the required
> '--cc' directives, as computed by 'etc/teams.scm get-maintainers
> <patch-file>'.
>
>
> Maxim Cournoyer (2):
>   teams: Add a "get-maintainer" command.
>   .patman: New configuration file.
>
>  .patman          |  9 +++++++++
>  etc/teams.scm.in | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 .patman
>
>
> base-commit: f28ca2447c5e2eef1ba6a3a11587380a665b0e26
> -- 
> 2.38.1
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#60218: [PATCH 0/2] New teams.scm 'get-maintainer' command (for integration with patman)
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 28 Dec 2022 15:42:03 -0500
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Hey,
> >
> >> Implemented in v2!  I guess it could be useful.  Note that it doesn't
> >> parse the patch for the file names touched, instead it assumes the patch
> >> was produced from a commit registered in git and then use the usual code
> >> path (for simplicity).
> >
> > Nice! I think that it is fair to assume that the commit is registered in
> > the local git repository.
> >
> > As a follow-up a documentation update could also be interesting as I
> > think that the new 'cc-members patch' command is easier to use that the
> > 'cc-member start end' variant.
>
> OK!  I intend to document the use of patman along teams.scm, as I find
> it helps automate things and keep submissions organized.  We can
> probably briefly mention the tool, and point the interested user to its
> full doc (which lives in u-boot-documentation).
>
> > I had a look to the rest of the patchset it seems fine to me :)
>
> OK, great!  I've now pushed the series.  Happy New Year!
>
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Maxim
>
>
> --- End Message ---