--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
human readable still wrong output (after 20+ years?) |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Oct 2022 09:24:07 -0700 |
The failure to use correct prefixes is still a cause for major confusion
amongst individuals especially when sharing data, and especially when other
programs are involved that do correctly report file sizes. K, M, G, T, etc.
have NEVER referred to base-2 values until they were incorrectly introduced
into the computing world, who knows, probably 50 years ago or more. Someday
maybe all computer programs will properly report file sizes. Please make
corrections so that '-h' flag correctly uses prefixes Ki, Mi, Gi, Ti, etc. Or
change -h default behavior to report base-10 values and add another flag to
report base-2 values+prefixes. Please no excuses about how this will break
other programs, that is up to their maintainers to fix given the corrected
output.
Please no suggestions for users to make changes to the default environment to
fix wrong output. -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT
prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.18.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads;
PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8,
LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to
/usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages coreutils depends on: ii libacl1 2.3.1-1 ii libattr1
1:2.5.1-1 ii libc6 2.35-2 ii libgmp10 2:6.2.1+dfsg1-1 ii libselinux1 3.4-1+b1
coreutils recommends no packages. coreutils suggests no packages. -- no debconf
information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#58521: human readable still wrong output (after 20+ years?) |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Jan 2023 12:28:54 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 |
On 2022-10-14 09:24, chandler wrote:
Please no excuses about how this will break other programs
Unfortunately backward-compatibility concerns are real, which means
we're not likely to make a big change to -h's behavior at this point.
You can use --si instead.
Assuming you're talking about 'df' and 'du', neither -h nor --si follows
the SI standard, since they both output prefixes without units. So this
is not a question of conforming to any standard.
--- End Message ---