--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Are our graphs okay? |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jan 2023 13:39:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.46.0 |
Hi Guix,
Continuing the discussion Ludo’ started over at guix-devel regarding
package size, note that we have
$ guix size emacs-minimal
Store-Objekt Gesamt Selbst
/gnu/store/lphzb1z0r4kbb453rsvnw7msrxxzp5r7-libgccjit-10.3.0 244.8
128.5 27.2%
/gnu/store/wrzjr2g38f23fqg09rrdcn10va5gc5xl-emacs-minimal-28.2 472.4
110.7 23.4%
/gnu/store/zyqimpkmpffc24nwwqp46cicj8ss85y5-binutils-2.37 126.0
54.4 11.5%
/gnu/store/ayc9r7162rphy4zjw8ch01pmyh214h82-glibc-2.33 76.6
36.6 7.8%
/gnu/store/5h2w4qi9hk1qzzgi1w83220ydslinr4s-glibc-2.33 38.3
36.6 7.7%
/gnu/store/6d0pl5khj08j3c2619jnypc8bznspgx8-gcc-10.3.0-lib 71.7
33.4 7.1%
/gnu/store/094bbaq6glba86h1d4cj16xhdi6fk2jl-gcc-10.3.0-lib 71.7
33.4 7.1%
/gnu/store/8fpk2cja3f07xls48jfnpgrzrljpqivr-coreutils-8.32 91.6
16.4 3.5%
/gnu/store/9rrnm5hdjw7cy96a2a9rfgh6y08wsbmf-ncurses-6.2.20210619 77.6
5.9 1.3%
/gnu/store/pmq05n0q25v4qjyibxfrp53v4391k7vh-mpfr-4.1.0 78.4
4.0 0.9%
/gnu/store/ajw8nnrnd6hr183skwqdgc8c7mazg97h-isl-0.23 77.3
2.9 0.6%
/gnu/store/fwbiihd2sbhai63y1pvvdh0f2bakfzrf-gmp-6.2.1 74.4
2.7 0.6%
/gnu/store/4f304c7dp68hkcp1zi1i07zm8nfvvyp7-bash-static-5.1.8 1.7
1.7 0.4%
/gnu/store/720rj90bch716isd8z7lcwrnvz28ap4y-bash-static-5.1.8 1.7
1.7 0.4%
/gnu/store/4y5m9lb8k3qkb1y9m02sw9w9a6hacd16-bash-minimal-5.1.8 39.3
1.0 0.2%
/gnu/store/xjwp2hsd9256icjjybfrmznppjicywf6-grep-3.6 73.5
0.8 0.2%
/gnu/store/ba02g5xkqiss6s5z8mbj9cvkal6l7b9g-mpc-1.2.1 78.8
0.4 0.1%
/gnu/store/a38k2v29l6l0iz6pmlk4dmzwdbvl10lq-acl-2.3.1 72.3
0.3 0.1%
/gnu/store/a7ggx0af69gv4k5mr1k617p4vy9kgx2v-libcap-2.62 72.0
0.3 0.1%
/gnu/store/jkjs0inmzhj4vsvclbf08nmh0shm7lrf-attr-2.5.1 71.9
0.2 0.1%
/gnu/store/8qv5kb2fgm4c3bf70zcg9l6hkf3qzpw9-zlib-1.2.11 71.9
0.2 0.0%
/gnu/store/0c1yfbxyv877mlgychfgvmk5ha2jqh52-gzip-1.10 73.7
0.2 0.0%
Gesamt: 472.4 MiB
but
$ guix graph --path emacs-minimal libgccjit
guix graph: Fehler: Kein Pfad von „emacs-minimal@28.2“ nach
„libgccjit@12.2.0“
and
$ guix graph --path /gnu/store/wrzjr2g38f23fqg09rrdcn10va5gc5xl-emacs-
minimal-28.2 /gnu/store/lphzb1z0r4kbb453rsvnw7msrxxzp5r7-libgccjit-
10.3.0 --type=referrers
guix graph: Fehler: Kein Pfad von
„/gnu/store/wrzjr2g38f23fqg09rrdcn10va5gc5xl-emacs-minimal-28.2“ nach
„/gnu/store/lphzb1z0r4kbb453rsvnw7msrxxzp5r7-libgccjit-10.3.0“
This is rather curious. How does libgccjit land in emacs-minimal's
closure?
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#60831: Are our graphs okay? |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Jan 2023 10:18:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.46.0 |
Am Dienstag, dem 17.01.2023 um 10:55 -0500 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > The ‘patch-compilation-driver’ phase pulls in libgccjit even though
> > it has been deliberately removed from emacs-minimal.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs)[#:phases]: Delete ‘patch-
> > compilation-driver’.
> > ---
> > Thanks Josselin for pointing this out.
>
> I'd add the following git tag "Reported-by: Josselin Poiret <email>"
> instead, but otherwise LGTM.
I pushed it without the tag because I initially reported the pulling
in; although Josselin did help in finding how it was pulled in.
Anyway, this particular bug should be fixed now. As for larger "Are
our graphs okay?" style bugs, I think we can definitely answer those
with "No.", given that cargo hasn't been replaced with antioxidant yet.
Thus, I'm closing this.
Cheers
--- End Message ---