emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#58249: closed ([PATCH] gnu: packages: qt: Fix qtbase-5 not building


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#58249: closed ([PATCH] gnu: packages: qt: Fix qtbase-5 not building on gcc 11 or later)
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:41:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 26 Jan 2023 11:40:30 -0500
with message-id <87fsbxxn9d.fsf@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#58249: [PATCH] gnu: packages: qt: Fix qtbase-5 not 
building on gcc 11 or later
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #58249,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: packages: qt: Fix qtbase-5 not building on gcc 11 or 
later
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
58249: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=58249
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] gnu: packages: qt: Fix qtbase-5 not building on gcc 11 or later Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 16:22:33 +0200
This fixes a bug that makes qtbase-5 unbuildable with gcc 11 and later

The QT issue https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-91909

This patch is based on conversation from
https://github.com/RPCS3/rpcs3/issues/10349

Attachment: 0001-gnu-packages-qt-Fix-qtbase-5-not-building-on-gcc-11.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#58249: [PATCH] gnu: packages: qt: Fix qtbase-5 not building on gcc 11 or later Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 11:40:30 -0500 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Hi,

Mája Tomášek <maya.tomasek@disroot.org> writes:

> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Mája Tomášek <maya.tomasek@disroot.org> writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> I don't know, it is a hidden bug that is likely to cause quite a big
>>> problem once Guix moves to GCC 11 or later, as many apps probably won't 
>>> update to
>>> Qt 6.
>>
>> The best solution may be to update our Qt 5 version; would you like to
>> give it a try?  Other than being a lot of new hashes to update (for each
>> qt5 component), it should be relatively low risk (with regards to
>> breaking existing Qt 5 packages).
>>
>> -- 
>> Thanks,
>> Maxim
>
> I haved looked into it, and guix has already shipped a patched version
> :)
>
> This can be closed now.
> Maya

Great, thanks for the follow-up.

I'm closing this by replying to 58249-done@debbugs.gnu.org in CC.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]