emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#60684: closed ([PATCH 0/1] Add font-google-noto-emoji)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#60684: closed ([PATCH 0/1] Add font-google-noto-emoji)
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 02:57:01 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 28 Jan 2023 10:56:41 +0800
with message-id <87wn57qsd2.fsf_-_@envs.net>
and subject line Re: bug#60684: [PATCH 0/1] Add font-google-noto-emoji
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #60684,
regarding [PATCH 0/1] Add font-google-noto-emoji
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
60684: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=60684
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH 0/1] Add font-google-noto-emoji Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 01:00:31 +0000
Hi,

I ventured down a black hole trying to get emacs render colored emojis with
OpenMoji. But whatever I tried they were still black and white. I noticed
though that using font-google-noto instead rendered emojis just fine in
color. It is really heavy and it's missing some emojis though. Therefore I
ended up package a newer version of Noto Color Emoji. It weights in at ~10MB
when built and covers the Unicode 15.0 standard.

Fredrik Salomonsson (1):
  gnu: Add font-google-noto-emoji.

 gnu/packages/fonts.scm | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)


base-commit: 2463e9f1fe10a1d7e02dff76f200da69cd3f24d1
-- 
2.38.1




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#60684: [PATCH 0/1] Add font-google-noto-emoji Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 10:56:41 +0800 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Fredrik Salomonsson <plattfot@posteo.net> writes:

> * gnu/packages/fonts.scm (font-google-noto-emoji): New variable.
> ---
>  gnu/packages/fonts.scm | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

Applied with fetching source via git, as the github generated tarballs
for tags maybe unstable.  Thank you!


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]