emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#72896: closed ([PATCH] gnu: Add julia-progressbars.)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#72896: closed ([PATCH] gnu: Add julia-progressbars.)
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 13:48:02 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 04 Sep 2024 15:45:11 +0200
with message-id <8734mfednc.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: [bug#72896] [PATCH] gnu: Add julia-progressbars.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #72896,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: Add julia-progressbars.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
72896: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=72896
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add julia-progressbars. Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 01:29:58 +0000
When I do multiple build rounds the outputs do not match and I am a little 
puzzled as to why. At first I thought it might be due to non-deterministic 
behavior in the test cases, but even when I disable the test cases I still run 
into the same issue. I am also running into this issue on another package I am 
working on, so I'm suspecting I'm just overlooking something. I would 
appreciate it if someone with experience packaging Julia software could take a 
look.

Best,
Spencer

Attachment: 0001-gnu-Add-julia-progressbars.patch
Description: 0001-gnu-Add-julia-progressbars.patch


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#72896] [PATCH] gnu: Add julia-progressbars. Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 15:45:11 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Hi,

"King, Spencer" <spencer.king@wustl.edu> skribis:

> When I do multiple build rounds the outputs do not match and I am a little 
> puzzled as to why. At first I thought it might be due to non-deterministic 
> behavior in the test cases, but even when I disable the test cases I still 
> run into the same issue. I am also running into this issue on another package 
> I am working on, so I'm suspecting I'm just overlooking something. I would 
> appreciate it if someone with experience packaging Julia software could take 
> a look.

That’s apparently a problem in Julia proper, and it affects all the
Julia packages it seems.  See for instance ‘guix challenge julia-csv’.

In this case, I ran:

  ./pre-inst-env guix build julia-progressbars --rounds=2 -K

and then:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ diff -ru 
/gnu/store/mhp5b36rc884pnbjj68nad0s5fkl3r40-julia-progressbars-1.5.1{,-check}
Binary files 
/gnu/store/mhp5b36rc884pnbjj68nad0s5fkl3r40-julia-progressbars-1.5.1/share/julia/compiled/v1.8/ProgressBars/qxsPw_D0cUh.ji
 and 
/gnu/store/mhp5b36rc884pnbjj68nad0s5fkl3r40-julia-progressbars-1.5.1-check/share/julia/compiled/v1.8/ProgressBars/qxsPw_D0cUh.ji
 differ
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

> From 8a6b96b00594196c8a7ae5a63db5a9cb778f5a17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Message-Id: 
> <8a6b96b00594196c8a7ae5a63db5a9cb778f5a17.1725066017.git.spencer.king@geneoscopy.com>
> From: Spencer King <spencer.king@geneoscopy.com>
> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 00:59:31 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add julia-progressbars.
>
> * gnu/packages/julia-xyz.scm (julia-progressbars): New variable.
>
> Change-Id: Idd2b6a8aaaec186c01ecbc852d03f3df84bab8b5

Applied, thanks!

Ludo’.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]